The main difference between various MinIO-KMS deployments is the KMS implementation. The following table helps you select the right option for your use case:

| KMS                                                                                          | Purpose                                                           |

      sort(
          insertionOrder,
          new Comparator<V>() {
            @Override
            public int compare(V left, V right) {
              // The indexes are small enough for the subtraction trick to be safe.
              return indexOfEntryWithValue(left) - indexOfEntryWithValue(right);
            }

            int indexOfEntryWithValue(V value) {
              for (int i = 0; i < orderedEntries.size(); i++) {

  /**
   * Verify thread safety by using a collection whose size() may be inconsistent with the actual
   * number of elements and whose elements may change over time.
   *
   * <p>This test might fail in GWT because the GWT emulations might count on the input collection
   * not to change during the copy. It is safe to do so in GWT because javascript is
   * single-threaded.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // GWT is single threaded

    // Test that listeners added both before and after the value is available
    // get called correctly.
    for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++) {

      // Right in the middle start up a thread to close the latch.
      if (i == 10) {
        new Thread(() -> latch.countDown()).start();
      }

      future.addListener(listenerLatch::countDown, exec);
    }

                 * so. We cannot just comment out this method and use readString of
                 * ServerMessageBlock.java because the arguments are different, however
                 * one might be able to reduce this.
                 */

                if (len > 0 && src[srcIndex + len - 1] == '\0') {
                    len--;
                }

Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to any instances of unacceptable behavior.

[Snapshot API Javadoc][guava-snapshot-api-docs] as well as
[Snapshot API Diffs][guava-snapshot-api-diffs] are also available.

Another easy way to get to the Javadoc is to open
[guava.dev/api](https://guava.dev/api). You can also jump right to a specific
class by appending the class name to guava.dev. For example,
[guava.dev/ImmutableList](https://guava.dev/ImmutableList)!

## Learn about Guava

-   Our users' guide, [Guava Explained]

   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): or we could make HOLES_FORBIDDEN a feature. Or we could declare that
   * implementations are permitted to throw IAE if a hole is requested, and we could update
   * test*Hole to permit IAE. (But might this ignore genuine bugs?) But see the TODO above
   * testLower, which could make this all unnecessary
   */
  public static Method[] getHoleMethods() {
    return new Method[] {

      /*
       * If another handleException() caller created the set, we need to use that copy in case yet
       * other callers have added to it.
       *
       * This read is guaranteed to get us the right value because we only set this once (here).
       *
       * requireNonNull is safe because either our compareAndSet succeeded or it failed because
       * another thread did it for us.
       */

		// Test case with wrong accessID.
		{
			authString:    fmt.Sprintf("%s %s:%s", signV2Algorithm, "InvalidAccessID", "signature"),
			expectedError: ErrInvalidAccessKeyID,
		},
		// Test case - 6.
		// Case with right accessID and format.
		{
			authString:    fmt.Sprintf("%s %s:%s", signV2Algorithm, accessID, "signature"),
			expectedError: ErrNone,
		},
	}

	for i, testCase := range testCases {