* close the open underlying stream.
   *
   * <p>Note: The input {@code Iterator} will be copied to an {@code ImmutableList} when this method
   * is called. This will fail if the iterator is infinite and may cause problems if the iterator
   * eagerly fetches data for each source when iterated (rather than producing sources that only
   * load data through their streams). Prefer using the {@link #concat(Iterable)} overload if
   * possible.

Dependências com `yield` evoluíram ao longo do tempo para cobrir diferentes casos de uso e corrigir alguns problemas.

         * However, we don't expose currentFuture to users, so they can't attach listeners. And the
         * Future might not even be a ListenableFuture, just a plain Future. That said, similar
         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to
         * Thread.interrupt() (as discussed in InterruptibleTask). At the end of the day, it's

	// Standard register names.
	for i := riscv.REG_X0; i <= riscv.REG_X31; i++ {
		// Disallow X3 in shared mode, as this will likely be used as the
		// GP register, which could result in problems in non-Go code,
		// including signal handlers.
		if shared && i == riscv.REG_GP {
			continue
		}
		if i == riscv.REG_TP || i == riscv.REG_G {
			continue
		}
		name := fmt.Sprintf("X%d", i-riscv.REG_X0)

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

Ahora, cada vez que un navegador esté creando un usuario con una contraseña, la API devolverá la misma contraseña en el response.

En este caso, podría no ser un problema, porque es el mismo usuario que envía la contraseña.

Pero si usamos el mismo modelo para otra *path operation*, podríamos estar enviando las contraseñas de nuestros usuarios a cada cliente.

/// danger | Peligro

Las dependencias con `yield` han evolucionado con el tiempo para cubrir diferentes casos de uso y corregir algunos problemas.

         * However, we don't expose currentFuture to users, so they can't attach listeners. And the
         * Future might not even be a ListenableFuture, just a plain Future. That said, similar
         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to
         * Thread.interrupt() (as discussed in InterruptibleTask). At the end of the day, it's

   * such a set can be performed efficiently, but others (such as {@link Set#hashCode} or {@link
   * Collections#frequency}) can cause major performance problems.
   *
   * <p>The returned set's {@link Object#toString} method returns a shorthand form of the set's
   * contents, such as {@code "[1..100]}"}.
   *

	// Officially, the name and comment fields are supposed to be encoded
	// in CP-437 (which is mostly compatible with ASCII), unless the UTF-8
	// flag bit is set. However, there are several problems:
	//
	//	* Many ZIP readers still do not support UTF-8.
	//	* If the UTF-8 flag is cleared, several readers simply interpret the
	//	name and comment fields as whatever the local system encoding is.
	//

  - Health check (liveness & readiness) probes using an HTTPGetAction will no longer follow redirects to different hostnames from the original probe request. Instead, these non-local redirects will be treated as a Success (the documented behavior). In this case an event with reason "ProbeWarning" will be generated, indicating that the redirect...