if (robotsTxtHelper != null) {
            robotsTxtHelper.setEnabled(robotsTxtEnabled);
        }

        // httpclient
        final RequestConfig.Builder requestConfigBuilder = RequestConfig.custom();
        final HttpClientBuilder httpClientBuilder = HttpClientBuilder.create();

        final Integer connectionTimeoutParam = getInitParameter(CONNECTION_TIMEOUT_PROPERTY, connectionTimeout, Integer.class);

        // Add multiple headers
        request.header("Accept", "application/json").header("Content-Type", "application/json").header("Authorization", "Bearer token123")
                .header("X-Custom-Header", "custom-value");

        assertNotNull(request);
    }

    @Test
    public void testGzipSetsCompressionToGzip() {
        CurlRequest request = new CurlRequest(Method.GET, "https://example.com");

        .addEqualityGroup(wrapperFunction.apply(generator.newFreshProxy(interfaceType)))
        // TODO: add an overload to EqualsTester to print custom error message?
        .testEquals();
  }

  private static <T> void testToString(
      Class<T> interfaceType, Function<? super T, ? extends T> wrapperFunction) {

 * {@code jcifs.smb.client.domain} or {@code jcifs.http.domainController}
 * properties are be specified. <b>With later containers the
 * {@code NtlmHttpFilter} should be used</b>. For custom NTLM HTTP Authentication schemes the {@code NtlmSsp} may be
 * used.
 * <p>
 * Read <a href="../../../ntlmhttpauth.html">jCIFS NTLM HTTP Authentication and the Network Explorer Servlet</a> related
 * information.
 *

 * lifecycle phase. Standard lifecycles use plugin execution {@code <phase>} or mojo default lifecycle phase to
 * calculate the execution plan, but custom lifecycles can use alternative mapping strategies.
 */
@Named(DefaultLifecycleMappingDelegate.HINT)
@Singleton
public class DefaultLifecycleMappingDelegate implements LifecycleMappingDelegate {

 * resources
 *
 * We need to look at Maven, and Nexus as use cases and figure out what each of them needs to be
 * able to do
 *
 * - now what is really the difference between this and loading a component in plexus - custom
 * classloading capability - remote resolution of dependencies - do we want a model for sharing
 * information among plugins, is this more like an extension point - do we need a sort of bus for

    @Mock
    private DcerpcHandle mockDcerpcHandle;

    // Mocking MsrpcLsarOpenPolicy2 and MsrpcLsarClose is tricky because they are created inside the constructor/method.
    // We need to use ArgumentCaptor or a custom Answer to control their behavior.
    // For now, let's assume we can mock their behavior through the sendrecv method of DcerpcHandle.

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {

* kubectl could scale custom resource again ([#81342](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/81342), [@knight42](https://github.com/knight42))

        assertTrue(result.endsWith("\n"));
    }

    @Test
    public void test_execute_withCustomException() {
        // Setup mock SearchLogHelper that throws custom exception
        SearchLogHelper mockSearchLogHelper = new SearchLogHelper() {
            @Override
            public void storeSearchLog() {

// The net.Conn must support all features as described by the net.Conn interface.
type ConnDialer func(ctx context.Context, address string) (net.Conn, error)

// ConnectWSWithRoutePath is like ConnectWS but with a custom grid route path.
func ConnectWSWithRoutePath(dial ContextDialer, auth AuthFn, tls *tls.Config, routePath string) func(ctx context.Context, remote string) (net.Conn, error) {