// we know ( [ )
        if (rangeMapEntry.getUpperBound().compareTo(rangeToRemove.upperBound) > 0) {
          // we know ( [ ] ), so insert the range ] ) back into the map --
          // it's being split apart
          putRangeMapEntry(
              rangeToRemove.upperBound,
              rangeMapEntry.getUpperBound(),

	return dm.lockBlocking(ctx, cancel, id, source, isReadLock, opts)
}

// lockBlocking will try to acquire either a read or a write lock
//
// The function will loop using a built-in timing randomized back-off
// algorithm until either the lock is acquired successfully or more
// time has elapsed than the timeout value.

       *   the case that the service is using CustomScheduler). (It needs it so that it can cancel
       *   the task and detect whether it has been cancelled.)
       *
       * - ReschedulableCallable has a reference back to its enclosing CustomScheduler. (It needs it
       *   so that it can call getNextSchedule).
       *
       * Maybe there is a way to avoid this cycle. But we think the cycle is safe enough to ignore:

// arbitrary number of commands in fc within a transaction. On success the changes are committed; if an error occurs
// they are rolled back.
func (db *DB) Transaction(fc func(tx *DB) error, opts ...*sql.TxOptions) (err error) {
	panicked := true

	if committer, ok := db.Statement.ConnPool.(TxCommitter); ok && committer != nil {
		// nested transaction

	}
	b = b[0:n]

	// Check the resulting bytes
	if !Equal(buf.Bytes(), b) {
		t.Fatalf("incorrect result from WriteRune: %q not %q", buf.Bytes(), b)
	}

	p := make([]byte, utf8.UTFMax)
	// Read it back with ReadRune
	for r := rune(0); r < NRune; r++ {
		size := utf8.EncodeRune(p, r)
		nr, nbytes, err := buf.ReadRune()
		if nr != r || nbytes != size || err != nil {

		t.Fatalf("tw.WriteHeader: %v", err)
	}
	if _, err := tw.Write(data); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("tw.Write: %v", err)
	}
	if err := tw.Close(); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("tw.Close: %v", err)
	}

	// Read it back.
	tr := NewReader(&b)
	rHdr, err := tr.Next()
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("tr.Next: %v", err)
	}
	if !reflect.DeepEqual(rHdr, hdr) {
		t.Errorf("Header mismatch.\n got %+v\nwant %+v", rHdr, hdr)
	}

      if (changes == null) {
        // The trickled element is still after index.
        return new MoveDesc<>(actualLastElement, toTrickle);
      } else {
        // The trickled element is back before index, but the replaced element
        // has now been moved after index.
        return new MoveDesc<>(actualLastElement, changes.replaced);
      }
    }

Example:

    Source (English):

        «««
        ```mermaid
        flowchart LR
            subgraph global[global env]
                harry-1[harry v1]

- Added validation to reject Pods using the `PodLevelResources` feature on Windows OS due to lack of support. The API server rejected Pods with pod-level resources and a `Pod.spec.os.name` targeting Windows. Kubelet on nodes running Windows also rejected Pods with pod-level resources at the admission phase. ([#133046](https://github.com/kubern...

- The job controller back-off logic is now decoupled from workqueue. In case of parallelism > 1, if there are multiple new failures in a reconciliation cycle, all the failures are taken into account to compute the back-off. Previously, the back-off kicked in for all types of failures; with this change, only pod failures are taken into account. If the back-off limits exceeds, the job is marked as failed immediately; before this change, the...