* any other implementation of this interface.
 *
 * <p>If you have your own graph implementation based around a custom node type {@code MyNode},
 * which has a method {@code getChildren()} that retrieves its successors in a graph:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, MyNode::getChildren);
 * }
 *
 * <p>If you have some other mechanism for returning the successors of a node, or one that doesn't

        void testConstructorAndOpnum() {
            // When: Creating close handle message
            samr.SamrCloseHandle message = new samr.SamrCloseHandle(mockPolicyHandle);

            // Then: Should have correct opnum and handle
            assertEquals(0x01, message.getOpnum());
            assertEquals(mockPolicyHandle, message.handle);
        }

        @Test

   */
  byte[] getBytesInternal() {
    return asBytes();
  }

  /**
   * Returns whether this {@code HashCode} and that {@code HashCode} have the same value, given that
   * they have the same number of bits.
   */
  abstract boolean equalsSameBits(HashCode that);

  /**
   * Creates a 32-bit {@code HashCode} representation of the given int value. The underlying bytes

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

b=[],e=a(this),f=e.attr("required"),h={};switch(f&&b.push("required"),(e.attr("type")||"").toLowerCase()){case"time":b.push("time"),a.formUtils.validators.validate_date||d||(d=!0,a.formUtils.loadModules("date"));break;case"url":b.push("url");break;case"email":b.push("email");break;case"date":b.push("date");break;case"number":b.push("number");var i=e.attr("max"),j=e.attr("min"),k=e.attr("step");j||i?(j||(j="0"),i||(i="9007199254740992"),k||(k="1"),h["data-validation-allowing"]="range["+j+";"+i+"]",0!=...

      if (!response.isSuccessful()) throw new IOException("Unexpected code " + response);

      System.out.println("Server: " + response.header("Server"));
      System.out.println("Date: " + response.header("Date"));
      System.out.println("Vary: " + response.headers("Vary"));
    }
  }

  public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {
    new AccessHeaders().run();
  }

      },
      "content_length": {
        "type": "long"
      },
      "created": {
        "type": "date",
        "format": "date_optional_time"
      },
      "timestamp": {
        "type": "date",
        "format": "date_optional_time"
      },
      "expires": {
        "type": "date",
        "format": "date_optional_time"
      },
      "digest": {
        "type": "text",

        // Verify that multiple threads were processed
        assertTrue("Should process at least one thread", threadCount.get() >= 1);
        assertTrue("Should have stack trace elements", stackTraceCount.get() > 0);
        assertTrue("Should have more stack traces than threads", stackTraceCount.get() > threadCount.get());
    }

    public void test_processThreadDump_withException() {

### High availability

A stand-alone MinIO server would go down if the server hosting the drives goes offline. In contrast, a distributed MinIO setup with _m_ servers and _n_ drives will have your data safe as long as _m/2_ servers or _m*n_/2 or more drives are online.

 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.dict.stemmeroverride;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.List;

import org.codelibs.fess.dict.DictionaryFile.PagingList;
import org.codelibs.fess.unit.UnitFessTestCase;

public class StemmerOverrideFileTest extends UnitFessTestCase {