*/
  @Override
  void putAll(Map<? extends K, ? extends V> map);

  // Views

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p>Because a bimap has unique values, this method returns a {@link Set}, instead of the {@link
   * java.util.Collection} specified in the {@link Map} interface.
   */
  @Override
  Set<V> values();

  /**

      Entry<K, V> entryCopy = mapEntry(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());

      iterator.remove();
      assertEquals(initialSize - 1, map.size());

      // Use "entryCopy" instead of "entry" because "entry" might be invalidated after
      // iterator.remove().
      assertFalse(entrySet.contains(entryCopy));
      assertInvariants(map);
      assertThrows(IllegalStateException.class, () -> iterator.remove());

    public Set<Feature<? super @Nullable Void>> getImpliedFeatures() {
      return emptySet();
    }
  }

  /**
   * Creates a suite whose map has some elements filtered out of view.
   *
   * <p>Because the map may be ascending or descending, this test must derive the relative order of
   * these extreme values rather than relying on their regular sort ordering.
   */
  final TestSuite createSubmapSuite(

    @Nullable
    A[] result = FluentIterable.from(annotations).filter(annotationType).toArray(annotationType);
    @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // safe because the input list contains no nulls
    A[] cast = (A[]) result;
    return cast;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the {@link AnnotatedType} of the parameter.
   *
   * @since 25.1 for guava-jre
   */

  }

  private boolean allBmp(String string) {
    // Ordinarily we'd use something like i += Character.charCount(string.codePointAt(i)) here. But
    // we can get away with i++ because the whole point of this method is to return false if we find
    // a code point that doesn't fit in a char.
    for (int i = 0; i < string.length(); i++) {
      if (string.codePointAt(i) > 0xffff) {
        return false;

    Class<TestEnum> shadowTestEnum =
        (Class<TestEnum>) Class.forName(TestEnum.class.getName(), false, shadowLoader);
    assertNotSame(shadowTestEnum, TestEnum.class);
    // We can't write Set<TestEnum> because that is a Set of the TestEnum from the original
    // ClassLoader.
    Set<Object> shadowConstants = new HashSet<>();
    for (TestEnum constant : TestEnum.values()) {

    </dependency>
  </dependencies>
  <build>
    <resources>
      <resource>
        <directory>..</directory>
        <includes>
          <include>LICENSE</include> <!-- copied from the parent pom because I couldn't figure out a way to make combine.children="append" work -->
          <include>proguard/*</include>
        </includes>
        <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
      </resource>
    </resources>
    <plugins>

cd "$TFCI_GIT_DIR"

# "TFCI" may optionally be set to the name of an env-type file with TFCI
# variables in it, OR may be left empty if the user has already exported the
# relevant variables in their environment. Because of 'set -o allexport' above
# (which is equivalent to "set -a"), every variable in the file is exported
# for other files to use.
#
# Separately, if TFCI is set *and* there are also additional TFCI_ variables

// UTF-8-encoded rune as a token. The sequence of runes returned is
// equivalent to that from a range loop over the input as a string, which
// means that erroneous UTF-8 encodings translate to U+FFFD = "\xef\xbf\xbd".
// Because of the Scan interface, this makes it impossible for the client to
// distinguish correctly encoded replacement runes from encoding errors.
func ScanRunes(data []byte, atEOF bool) (advance int, token []byte, err error) {

* `feature`: Features
    * New features, adding support for things that didn't exist before.
* `bug`: Fixes
    * Something that was supported didn't work, and this fixes it. There are many PRs that claim to be bug fixes because the user is doing something in an unexpected way that is not supported, but they considered it what should be supported by default. Many of these are actually features or refactors. But in some cases there's an actual bug.