/*
         * We wish to test whether or not x <= (sqrtFloor + 0.5)^2 = halfSquare + 0.25. Since both x
         * and halfSquare are integers, this is equivalent to testing whether or not x <=
         * halfSquare. (We have to deal with overflow, though.)
         *
         * If we treat halfSquare as an unsigned int, we know that
         *            sqrtFloor^2 <= x < (sqrtFloor + 1)^2

// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class CollectionSerializationTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {
  @CollectionFeature.Require(SERIALIZABLE)
  public void testReserialize() {
    // For a bare Collection, the most we can guarantee is that the elements are preserved.

    return delegate.hashCode();
  }

  private void validate() {
    // Don't use checkState(), because we don't want the overhead of generating the error message
    // unless it's actually going to be used; validate() is called for all set method calls, so it
    // needs to be fast.
    // (We could instead generate the message once, when the set is created, but zero is better.)
    if (!validator.get()) {

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@IgnoreJRERequirement // We opt into library desugaring for our tests.
public class CollectionForEachTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: repro
    attributes:
      label: How can we reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: additional
    attributes:
      label: Anything else we need to know?

  - type: textarea
    id: kubeVersion
    attributes:
      label: Kubernetes version
      value: |

 * classes and the classes they depend on. The classes are not relocated, they all
 * remain in their original namespace. This reduces the final Gradle distribution
 * size and makes us more conscious of which parts of a library we really need.
 *
 * WARNING: if you decide to do the minification by hand, make sure that you cover all paths of loading classes:
 * reflection, dynamic loading, etc. and understand how the library works internally.

                licenseCommit + ELASTIC_LICENSE_URL_POSTFIX);
        // But stick the Elastic license url in project.ext so we can get it if we need to switch to it
        project.getExtensions().getExtraProperties().set("elasticLicenseUrl", projectLicenseURL);

        MapProperty<String, String> convention = licensesProperty.convention(

  }

  public void testToString() {
    // We can easily afford to test this exhaustively.
    for (int i = 0; i <= 0xff; i++) {
      assertThat(UnsignedBytes.toString((byte) i)).isEqualTo(Integer.toString(i));
    }
  }

  public void testToStringWithRadix() {
    // We can easily afford to test this exhaustively.

   * than CPUs, supposing that each thread were bound to a CPU,
   * there would exist a perfect hash function mapping threads to
   * slots that eliminates collisions. When we reach capacity, we
   * search for this mapping by randomly varying the hash codes of
   * colliding threads.  Because search is random, and collisions
   * only become known via CAS failures, convergence can be slow,