}

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 })
    @DisplayName("Test verify method with different extra padding values")
    void testVerifyWithDifferentExtraPadding(int extraPad) {
        // Arrange
        int offset = 0;
        int length = testData.length;

* [MinIO Erasure Code QuickStart Guide](https://docs.min.io/community/minio-object-store/operations/concepts/erasure-coding.html)...

Of course, the attackers would not try all this by hand, they would write a program to do it, possibly with thousands or millions of tests per second. And they would get just one extra correct letter at a time.

But doing that, in some minutes or hours the attackers would have guessed the correct username and password, with the "help" of our application, just using the time taken to answer.

        result = KuromojiCSVUtil.parse(value);
        assertEquals(4, result.length);
        assertEquals("John Doe", result[0]);
        assertEquals("Software Engineer", result[1]);
        assertEquals("******@****.***", result[2]);
        assertEquals("\"Loves \"\"coding\"\" and coffee\"", result[3]);

        byte[] buffer = new byte[testString.length() * 2 + 2 + 1]; // +1 for alignment
        int len = smb.writeString(testString, buffer, 1);
        // When dstIndex=1 and headerStart=1, (1-1)%2=0, no alignment padding needed
        // Length is string bytes (15*2) + 2 null terminators = 32
        assertEquals(testString.length() * 2 + 2, len);
        String readString = smb.readString(buffer, 1);

 * domain. The author hereby disclaims copyright to this source code.
 */

/*
 * Source:
 * http://code.google.com/p/smhasher/source/browse/trunk/MurmurHash3.cpp
 * (Modified to adapt to Guava coding conventions and to use the HashFunction interface)
 */

package com.google.common.hash;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkPositionIndexes;

            SMBUtil.writeInt4(remaining, buffer, 8); // Remaining
            SMBUtil.writeInt2(0, buffer, 12); // WriteChannelInfoOffset
            SMBUtil.writeInt2(0, buffer, 14); // WriteChannelInfoLength
            // Padding bytes (4 bytes) at offset 16-19
            return buffer;
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Integration Tests")
    class IntegrationTests {

        @Test

		var hint string
		if endpoint.URL != nil {
			hint = fmt.Sprintf("Drive '%s' does not support O_DIRECT flags, MinIO erasure coding requires filesystems with O_DIRECT support", endpoint.Path)
		} else {
			hint = "Drives do not support O_DIRECT flags, MinIO erasure coding requires filesystems with O_DIRECT support"
		}
		logger.Fatal(config.ErrUnsupportedBackend(err).Hint("%s", hint), "Unable to initialize backend")

      /*
       * Using weak references here could let us release exceptions earlier, but:
       *
       * 1. On Android, querying a WeakReference blocks if the GC is doing an otherwise-concurrent
       * pass.
       *
       * 2. We would probably choose to compare exceptions using == instead of equals() (for

                }
            }
            if (targetInformation != null) {
                flags |= NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_TARGET_INFO;
                // empty context is needed for padding when t.i. is supplied.
                if (context == null) {
                    context = new byte[8];
                }
            }
            int data = 32;
            if (context != null) {