if (singleByte) {
      for (int i = off; i < off + len; i++) {
        out.write(b[i]);
      }
    } else {
      out.write(b, off, len);
    }
    out.flush(); // for coverage
  }

  // TODO(chrisn): only works if we ensure we have crossed file threshold

  public void testWriteErrorAfterClose() throws Exception {
    byte[] data = newPreFilledByteArray(100);

    this.equivalence = checkNotNull(equivalence);
    this.relationshipName = checkNotNull(relationshipName);
    this.hashName = checkNotNull(hashName);
    this.itemReporter = checkNotNull(itemReporter);
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): should we reject null items, since the tests already check null automatically?
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public RelationshipTester<T> addRelatedGroup(Iterable<? extends T> group) {

Esto funciona de la misma manera que con los modelos de Pydantic. Y en realidad se logra de la misma manera internamente, utilizando Pydantic.

/// info | Información

Ten en cuenta que los dataclasses no pueden hacer todo lo que los modelos de Pydantic pueden hacer.

Así que, podrías necesitar seguir usando modelos de Pydantic.

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public abstract class AbstractMultisetSetCountTester<E> extends AbstractMultisetTester<E> {
  /*
   * TODO: consider adding MultisetFeatures.SUPPORTS_SET_COUNT. Currently we
   * assume that using setCount() to increase the count is permitted iff add()
   * is permitted and similarly for decrease/remove(). We assume that a

 */
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/989
@DoNotMock("Use ImmutableRangeMap or TreeRangeMap")
@GwtIncompatible
public interface RangeMap<K extends Comparable, V> {
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): These docs sometimes say "map" and sometimes say "range map." Pick one, or at
   * least decide on a policy for when to use which.
   */

  /**

Solo recuerda, el punto más importante es: trata de ser amable. La gente llega con sus frustraciones y, en muchos casos, no pregunta de la mejor manera, pero haz todo lo posible por ser amable. 🤗

La idea es que la comunidad de **FastAPI** sea amable y acogedora. Al mismo tiempo, no aceptes acoso o comportamiento irrespetuoso hacia los demás. Tenemos que cuidarnos unos a otros.

---

    // Parsing to an integer might fail because Java 8 returns "1.8" instead of "8."
    // We can continue if it's 1.8, and we can continue if it's an integer in [9, 20).
    if (javaVersion != null && javaVersion >= 20) {
      // TODO(b/261217224, b/361604053): Make this test work under newer JDKs.
      return;
    }
    TimedWaiterThread thread = new TimedWaiterThread(new AbstractFuture<Object>() {}, 2, SECONDS);
    thread.start();

recente do OpenAPI: **3.1.0**, lançada recentemente. Baseado no JSON Schema mais recente e a maioria das modificações da versão customizada do OpenAPI do JSON Schema são removidas, em troca dos recursos das versões recentes do JSON Schema, portanto, todas essas pequenas diferenças são reduzidas. No entanto, a UI do Swagger atualmente não oferece suporte a OpenAPI 3.1.0, então, por enquanto, é melhor continuar usando as opções acima....

 * Generates tests of all methods on a {@code ByteSink} given various inputs written to it as well
 * as sub-suites for testing the {@code CharSink} view in the same way.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // TODO(b/230620681): Make this available (even though we won't run it).
@NullUnmarked
public class ByteSinkTester extends SourceSinkTester<ByteSink, byte[], ByteSinkFactory> {

 * Generates tests of all methods on a {@code ByteSink} given various inputs written to it as well
 * as sub-suites for testing the {@code CharSink} view in the same way.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // TODO(b/230620681): Make this available (even though we won't run it).
@NullUnmarked
public class ByteSinkTester extends SourceSinkTester<ByteSink, byte[], ByteSinkFactory> {