*       method to obtain a correctly-sized copy.
 *   <li>The performance of using the associated {@code Builder} class can be assumed to be no
 *       worse, and possibly better, than creating a mutable collection and copying it.
 *   <li>Implementations generally do not cache hash codes. If your element or key type has a slow
 *       {@code hashCode} implementation, it should cache it itself.
 * </ul>

  }

  /**
   * Returns a new builder with a hint for how many distinct keys are expected to be added. The
   * generated builder is equivalent to that returned by {@link #builder}, but may perform better if
   * {@code expectedKeys} is a good estimate.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code expectedKeys} is negative
   * @since 33.3.0
   */

   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> According to our
   * benchmarking
   * on Open JDK 7, {@link #immutableSortedCopy} generally performs better (in both time and space)
   * than this method, and this method in turn generally performs better than copying the list and
   * calling {@link Collections#sort(List)}.
   */
  // TODO(kevinb): rerun benchmarks including new options

            try {
                if ( query != null ) {
                    String server = queryLookup(query, "server");
                    if ( server != null && server.length() > 0 ) {
                        this.addresses = new UniAddress[1];
                        this.addresses[ 0 ] = this.ctx.getNameServiceClient().getByName(server);
                    }
                    String address = queryLookup(query, "address");

   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of entries added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,
   * but not exactly, the number of entries added to the builder.

    /**
     * User property for chained LRM: list of "tail" local repository paths (separated by comma), to be used with
     * {@code org.eclipse.aether.util.repository.ChainedLocalRepositoryManager}.
     * Default value: <code>null</code>, no chained LRM is used.
     *
     * @since 3.9.0
     */
    @Config

      "options": {
        "code": {
          "language": "plaintext",
          "showLineNumbers": false,
          "showMiniMap": false
        },
        "content": "<div class=\"dashboard-header text-center\">\n<span>SERVICE: $service</span>\n</div>",
        "mode": "html"
      },
      "pluginVersion": "10.1.5",
      "transparent": true,
      "type": "text"
    },
    {
      "datasource": {

import org.apache.maven.settings.Mirror;
import org.apache.maven.settings.Proxy;
import org.apache.maven.settings.Server;
import org.apache.maven.settings.Settings;
import org.codehaus.plexus.PlexusContainer;
import org.codehaus.plexus.component.repository.exception.ComponentLookupException;
import org.eclipse.aether.RepositorySystemSession;

import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;

/**
 * A Maven execution session.
 *

    /*
     * The striding algorithm works roughly as follows: it is universally the case that
     * CRC(x ^ y) == CRC(x) ^ CRC(y).  The approach we take is to break the message as follows,
     * with each letter representing a 4-byte word: ABCDABCDABCDABCD... and to calculate
     * CRC(A000A000A000...), CRC(0B000B000B...), CRC(00C000C000C...), CRC(000D000D000D...)

rget).data(e);n||(n=new this.constructor(t.currentTarget,this._getDelegateConfig()),g(t.currentTarget).data(e,n)),n._activeTrigger.click=!n._activeTrigger.click,n._isWithActiveTrigger()?n._enter(null,n):n._leave(null,n)}else{if(g(this.getTipElement()).hasClass(Me))return void this._leave(null,this);this._enter(null,this)}},t.dispose=function(){clearTimeout(this._timeout),g.removeData(this.element,this.constructor.DATA_KEY),g(this.element).off(this.constructor.EVENT_KEY),g(this.element).closest("...