import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;

/**
 * A test which demonstrates maven's recursive inheritance where
 * we are testing to make sure that elements stated in a model are
 * not clobbered by the same elements elsewhere in the lineage.
 *
 */
@Deprecated
class ProjectInheritanceTest extends AbstractProjectInheritanceTestCase {

  /** Total number of pings received by this web socket. */
  private var receivedPingCount = 0

  /** Total number of pongs received by this web socket. */
  private var receivedPongCount = 0

  /** True if we have sent a ping that is still awaiting a reply. */
  private var awaitingPong = false

  init {
    require("GET" == originalRequest.method) {
      "Request must be GET: ${originalRequest.method}"
    }

    }
    body.awaitSuccess()
  }

  /**
   * Duplex calls that have follow-ups are weird. By the time we know there's a follow-up we've
   * already split off another thread to stream the request body. Because we permit at most one
   * exchange at a time we break the request stream out from under that writer.
   */
  @Test
  fun duplexWithRedirect() {
    enableProtocol(Protocol.HTTP_2)

    }

    deflatedBytes.writeAll(buffer)
    deflatedBytes.writeInt(OCTETS_TO_ADD_BEFORE_INFLATION)

    val totalBytesToRead = inflater.bytesRead + deflatedBytes.size

    // We cannot read all, as the source does not close.
    // Instead, we ensure that all bytes from source have been processed by inflater.
    do {
      inflaterSource.readOrInflate(buffer, Long.MAX_VALUE)

  }

  /*
   * TODO(b/242884182): Figure out why this helps produce the same class file when we compile most
   * of common.collect a second time with the results of the first compilation on the classpath. Or
   * just back this out once we stop doing that (which we'll do after our internal GWT setup
   * changes).
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<Object, Collection<Object>> asMap() {

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

    return delegate.hashCode();
  }

  private void validate() {
    // Don't use checkState(), because we don't want the overhead of generating the error message
    // unless it's actually going to be used; validate() is called for all set method calls, so it
    // needs to be fast.
    // (We could instead generate the message once, when the set is created, but zero is better.)
    if (!validator.get()) {

    assertThat(server.takeRequest().exchangeIndex).isEqualTo(1)
  }

  /**
   * Test to ensure we don't  throw a read timeout on responses that are progressing.  For this
   * case, we take a 4KiB body and throttle it to 1KiB/second.  We set the read timeout to two
   * seconds.  If our implementation is acting correctly, it will not throw, as it is progressing.
   */
  @ParameterizedTest

 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Jesse Wilson
 * @author Austin Appleby
 */
@GwtCompatible
final class Hashing {
  private Hashing() {}

  /*
   * These should be ints, but we need to use longs to force GWT to do the multiplications with
   * enough precision.
   */
  private static final long C1 = 0xcc9e2d51;
  private static final long C2 = 0x1b873593;

  /*

		return false, ctx.Err()
	}
	if len(args.UID) == 0 {
		for _, resource := range args.Resources {
			lris, ok := l.lockMap[resource]
			if !ok {
				continue
			}
			// Collect uids, so we don't mutate while we delete
			uids := make([]string, 0, len(lris))
			for _, lri := range lris {
				uids = append(uids, lri.UID)
			}

			// Delete collected uids:
			for _, uid := range uids {