### Multi destination replication

The replication design for multiple sites works in a similar manner as described above for two site scenario. However there are some

   * input byte array {@code {0x54, 0x32}} would yield the {@code char} value {@code '\\u5432'}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 2 elements
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // doesn't work
  public static char fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

   * input byte array {@code {0x54, 0x32}} would yield the {@code short} value {@code 0x5432}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 2 elements
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // doesn't work
  public static short fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

   * input byte array {@code {0x54, 0x32}} would yield the {@code short} value {@code 0x5432}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 2 elements
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // doesn't work
  public static short fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

- Fixed a bug where CEL expressions in CRD validation rules would incorrectly compute a high estimated cost for functions that return strings, lists or maps.

 *
 * <p>The extra bookkeeping done by cycle detecting locks comes at some cost to performance.
 * Benchmarks (as of December 2011) show that:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>for an unnested {@code lock()} and {@code unlock()}, a cycle detecting lock takes 38ns as
 *       opposed to the 24ns taken by a plain lock.
 *   <li>for nested locking, the cost increases with the depth of the nesting:
 *       <ul>

	testCases := []struct {
		objectName string
		shouldPass bool
	}{
		// cases which should pass the test.
		// passing in valid object name.
		{"object", true},
		{"The Shining Script <v1>.pdf", true},
		{"Cost Benefit Analysis (2009-2010).pptx", true},
		{"117Gn8rfHL2ACARPAhaFd0AGzic9pUbIA/5OCn5A", true},
		{"SHØRT", true},
		{"f*le", true},
		{"contains-^-caret", true},
		{"contains-|-pipe", true},

   * 0x12131415}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 4 elements
   */
  public static int fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

     * references (currently executing code, file descriptors).
     *
     * Depending on the usage scenario, this may have some benefit as there won't be any delays for restablishing these
     * resources, however comes at the cost of having to properly release all SmbFile instances you no longer need.
     *
     * @return whether to use strict resource lifecycle
     */
    boolean isStrictResourceLifecycle();

    /**

   * input byte array {@code {0x54, 0x32}} would yield the {@code char} value {@code '\\u5432'}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 2 elements
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // doesn't work
  public static char fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {