*
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingSortedSet} forward <i>indiscriminately</i> to
 * the methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link #add} alone <i>will not</i> change
 * the behavior of {@link #addAll}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should
 * override {@code addAll} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the

import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.Set;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A {@link Multimap} whose contents will never change, with many other important properties
 * detailed at {@link ImmutableCollection}.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> avoid <i>direct</i> usage of {@link ImmutableMultimap} as a type (as with

     *
     * <p><b>Note:</b> in general, code should assume that the string form returned by {@code
     * ToStringHelper} for a given object may change. In particular, the list of types which are
     * checked for emptiness is subject to change. We currently check {@code CharSequence}s, {@code
     * Collection}s, {@code Map}s, optionals (including Guava's), and arrays.
     *
     * @since 33.4.0
     */

 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingSortedMultiset} forward
 * <b>indiscriminately</b> to the methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link
 * #add(Object, int)} alone <b>will not</b> change the behavior of {@link #add(Object)}, which can
 * lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should override {@code add(Object)} as well,
 * either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the provided {@code standardAdd}

       * pass.
       *
       * 2. We would probably choose to compare exceptions using == instead of equals() (for
       * consistency with how weak references are cleared). That's a behavior change -- arguably the
       * removal of a feature.
       *
       * Fortunately, exceptions rarely contain references to expensive resources.
       */

      //
      seenExceptionsLocal = newConcurrentHashSet();

 * {@link #enqueue} and {@link #dispatch} are 2 different methods. It is expected that the decision
 * to run a particular event is made during the state change, but the decision to actually invoke
 * the listeners can be delayed slightly so that locks can be dropped. Also, because {@link
 * #dispatch} is expected to be called concurrently, it is idempotent.
 */
@J2ktIncompatible

   */
  public static List<String> readLines(URL url, Charset charset) throws IOException {
    // don't use asCharSource(url, charset).readLines() because that returns
    // an immutable list, which would change the behavior of this method
    return readLines(
        url,
        charset,
        new LineProcessor<List<String>>() {
          final List<String> result = new ArrayList<>();

          @Override

    - [CVE-2024-9042: Command Injection affecting Windows nodes via nodes/*/logs/query API](#cve-2024-9042-command-injection-affecting-windows-nodes-via-nodeslogsquery-api)
  - [Changes by Kind](#changes-by-kind-2)
    - [API Change](#api-change)
    - [Feature](#feature-1)
    - [Bug or Regression](#bug-or-regression)
  - [Dependencies](#dependencies-2)
    - [Added](#added-2)
    - [Changed](#changed-2)
    - [Removed](#removed-2)

                this.node[_i] = (byte) _src.dec_ndr_small();
            }
        }
    }

    /**
     * Policy handle structure for DCE/RPC operations.
     * Represents an opaque handle used to reference server-side resources.
     */
    public static class policy_handle extends NdrObject {

        /**
         * Default constructor for policy_handle.
         */

Então, durante esse tempo, o computador pode ir e fazer outro trabalho, enquanto o "arquivo lento" 📝 termina.

Então o computador / programa 🤖 irá voltar sempre que tiver uma chance, seja porque ele está esperando novamente, ou quando ele 🤖 terminar todo o trabalho que tem até esse ponto. E ele 🤖 irá ver se alguma das tarefas que estava esperando já terminaram de fazer o que quer que tinham que fazer.