import java.util.ArrayDeque;
import java.util.Deque;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.concurrent.Executor;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Unit tests for {@link CacheLoader}.
 *
 * @author Charles Fry
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class CacheLoaderTest extends TestCase {

 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.common.base.Function;
import com.google.common.testing.NullPointerTester;
import java.util.List;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

/**
 * Tests for {@code TreeTraverser}.
 *
 * @deprecated Use {@link com.google.common.graph.Traverser} instead.
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */

import static org.junit.Assert.assertArrayEquals;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;

import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream;
import java.util.Random;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests for AbstractByteHasher.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class AbstractByteHasherTest extends TestCase {

 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import junit.framework.Test;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests for {@code TreeRangeMap}.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible // NavigableMap

# Segurança { #security }

Há várias formas de lidar segurança, autenticação e autorização.

E isso normalmente é um tópico “difícil” e complexo.

Em muitos frameworks e sistemas, apenas lidar com segurança e autenticação exige muito esforço e código (em muitos casos isso pode ser 50% ou mais de todo o código escrito).