failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects incrementally. Storage servers once deployed should not require drive replacement or healing for the lifetime of the server. MinIO's erasure coded backend...

  private static final RangeMap<Comparable<?>, Object> EMPTY_SUB_RANGE_MAP =
      new RangeMap<Comparable<?>, Object>() {
        @Override
        public @Nullable Object get(Comparable<?> key) {
          return null;
        }

        @Override
        public @Nullable Entry<Range<Comparable<?>>, Object> getEntry(Comparable<?> key) {
          return null;
        }

public final class SafeTreeMap<K, V> implements Serializable, NavigableMap<K, V> {
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  private static final Comparator<Object> NATURAL_ORDER =
      new Comparator<Object>() {
        @Override
        public int compare(Object o1, Object o2) {
          return ((Comparable<Object>) o1).compareTo(o2);
        }
      };

  private final NavigableMap<K, V> delegate;

  public SafeTreeMap() {

		objectName string
		sipHash    int
	}{
		// cases which should pass the test.
		// passing in valid object name.
		{"object", 37},
		{"The Shining Script <v1>.pdf", 38},
		{"Cost Benefit Analysis (2009-2010).pptx", 59},
		{"117Gn8rfHL2ACARPAhaFd0AGzic9pUbIA/5OCn5A", 35},
		{"SHØRT", 49},
		{"There are far too many object names, and far too few bucket names!", 8},
		{"a/b/c/", 159},
		{"/a/b/c", 96},

    TypeVariableInvocationHandler(TypeVariableImpl<?> typeVariableImpl) {
      this.typeVariableImpl = typeVariableImpl;
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, @Nullable Object @Nullable [] args)
        throws Throwable {
      String methodName = method.getName();
      Method typeVariableMethod = typeVariableMethods.get(methodName);

     * Converts to {@link Double}.
     *
     * @param o
     *            The object to convert
     * @return The converted {@link Double}
     */
    public static Double toDouble(final Object o) {
        return toDouble(o, null);
    }

    /**
     * Converts to {@link Double}.
     *
     * @param o
     *            The object to convert
     * @param pattern
     *            The pattern string

	obj, err := newObjectLayer(ctx, mustGetPoolEndpoints(0, disks...))
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal("Unexpected object layer initialization error", err)
	}

	_, ok := obj.(*erasureServerPools)
	if !ok {
		t.Fatal("Unexpected object layer detected", reflect.TypeOf(obj))
	}

	// Tests for Erasure object layer initialization.

	// Create temporary backend for the test server.
	nDisks = 16

 * @since 7.0
 */
@DoNotMock("Use ImmutableTable, HashBasedTable, or another implementation")
@GwtCompatible
public interface Table<
    R extends @Nullable Object, C extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object> {
  // TODO(jlevy): Consider adding methods similar to ConcurrentMap methods.

  // Accessors

  /**

      return (K[]) new Object[length];
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    @Override
    public V[] createValueArray(int length) {
      return (V[]) new Object[length];
    }

    @Override
    public TestSubjectGenerator<?> getInnerGenerator() {
      return generator;
    }
  }

  public static class InverseBiMapGenerator<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>

    }

    @Override
    public int count(@Nullable Object element) {
      return standardCount(element);
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object object) {
      return standardEquals(object);
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return standardHashCode();
    }

    @Override