for (int i = 0; i < 11; i++) {
      limiter.acquire(); // #7, showing off the warmup starting from totally cold
    }

    // make sure the areas (times) remain the same, while permits are different
    assertEvents(
        "R0.00, R1.38, R1.13, R0.88, R0.63, R0.50, R0.50, R0.50", // #1
        "U4.50", // #2
        "R0.00, R1.38, R1.13", // #3, after that the rate changes

         * original, identical JDK TypeVariable. By doing so, we sidestep the problem entirely.
         *
         * 2b. If the resolved types are different from the original types, things are trickier. The
         * only way to get a TypeVariable instance for the resolved types is to create our own. The

    for (int i = 0; i < 11; i++) {
      limiter.acquire(); // #7, showing off the warmup starting from totally cold
    }

    // make sure the areas (times) remain the same, while permits are different
    assertEvents(
        "R0.00, R1.38, R1.13, R0.88, R0.63, R0.50, R0.50, R0.50", // #1
        "U4.50", // #2
        "R0.00, R1.38, R1.13", // #3, after that the rate changes

import java.util.regex.Pattern;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * Generates fresh instances of types that are different from each other (if possible).
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 */
@GwtIncompatible
@J2ktIncompatible
class FreshValueGenerator {

  private static final ImmutableMap<Class<?>, Method> GENERATORS;

    
    /* UPDATE: Maybe not! Could this be a Unicode alignment issue. I hope
     * so. We cannot just comment out this method and use readString of
     * ServerMessageBlock.java because the arguments are different, however
     * one might be able to reduce this.
     */
    
                if( len > 0 && src[srcIndex + len - 1] == '\0' ) {
                    len--;
                }

import com.google.errorprone.annotations.Immutable;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.Map;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * Used to represent the order of elements in a data structure that supports different options for
 * iteration order guarantees.
 *
 * <p>Example usage:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * MutableGraph<Integer> graph =
 *     GraphBuilder.directed().nodeOrder(ElementOrder.<Integer>natural()).build();
 * }</pre>

import com.google.errorprone.annotations.Immutable;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.Map;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * Used to represent the order of elements in a data structure that supports different options for
 * iteration order guarantees.
 *
 * <p>Example usage:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * MutableGraph<Integer> graph =
 *     GraphBuilder.directed().nodeOrder(ElementOrder.<Integer>natural()).build();
 * }</pre>

        buffer.add(e);
        added++;
      }
    }
    return added;
  }

  /**
   * Drains the queue as {@linkplain #drain(BlockingQueue, Collection, int, Duration)}, but with a
   * different behavior in case it is interrupted while waiting. In that case, the operation will
   * continue as usual, and in the end the thread's interruption status will be set (no {@code
   * InterruptedException} is thrown).
   *

      Spliterator.OfPrimitive<E, C, ?> split = spliteratorOfPrimitive.trySplit();
      return split == null ? null : new GeneralSpliteratorOfPrimitive<>(split, consumerizer);
    }
  }

  /**
   * Different ways of decomposing a Spliterator, all of which must produce the same elements (up to
   * ordering, if Spliterator.ORDERED is not present).
   */

 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have
 * released multiple ListenableFuture.class files that are not byte-for-byte compatible even from
 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *
 * (We could consider releasing a listenablefuture:1.0.1 someday. But we would want to look into how