A parte mais importante é que quando você chama ``python`, esse é exatamente o "`python`" que será executado.

Assim, você pode confirmar se está no ambiente virtual correto.

/// tip | Dica

É fácil ativar um ambiente virtual, obter um Python e então **ir para outro projeto**.

        int offset = 50;
        int length = name.writeWireFormat(dst, offset);

        // Check first byte at offset
        assertEquals(0x20, dst[offset]);

        // Check type encoding at correct offset
        assertEquals('C', dst[offset + 31]);
        assertEquals('A', dst[offset + 32]);

        assertTrue(length > 33);
    }

    @Test

        assertTrue(lenCap.getAllValues().stream().allMatch(len -> len == 1));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("write(short/char/int/long/float/double): correct byte lengths")
    void write_multiByteVariants_lengths() throws Exception {
        SmbRandomAccessFile raf = spy(newInstance("rw", false, true, false));
        doNothing().when(raf).write(any(byte[].class), anyInt(), anyInt());

</p>

<p>
A <i>goroutine execution</i> is modeled as a set of memory operations executed by a single goroutine.
</p>

<p>
<b>Requirement 1</b>:
The memory operations in each goroutine must correspond to a correct sequential execution of that goroutine,
given the values read from and written to memory.
That execution must be consistent with the <i>sequenced before</i> relation,

    addEdge(N1, N2, E12);
    addEdge(N1, N2, E12_A);

    assertThat(network.edgesConnecting(N1, N2)).containsExactly(E12, E12_A);
    // Passed nodes should be in the correct edge direction, first is the
    // source node and the second is the target node
    assertThat(network.edgesConnecting(N2, N1)).isEmpty();
  }

  @Test
  public void edgesConnecting_parallelEdges_undirected() {

   *       one with {@link CharSequence#charAt(int)}.
   *   <li>use {@link Appendable#append(CharSequence)} in {@link #copyTo(Appendable)} and {@link
   *       #copyTo(CharSink)}. We know this is correct since strings are immutable and so the length
   *       can't change, and it is faster because many writers and appendables are optimized for
   *       appending string instances.
   * </ul>
   */

   *       one with {@link CharSequence#charAt(int)}.
   *   <li>use {@link Appendable#append(CharSequence)} in {@link #copyTo(Appendable)} and {@link
   *       #copyTo(CharSink)}. We know this is correct since strings are immutable and so the length
   *       can't change, and it is faster because many writers and appendables are optimized for
   *       appending string instances.
   * </ul>
   */

            len += pad8(bufferIndex);
        } else if (compound && this.nextCommand == 0 && this.readSize > 0) {
            // Apply compound response handling as per MS-SMB2 3.2.5.1.9 - correct for both compound and single responses
            // 3.2.5.1.9 Handling Compounded Responses
            // The final response in the compounded response chain will have NextCommand equal to 0,

        long retrievedTime = file.lastModified();
        // Allow for reasonable precision differences
        assertTrue(Math.abs(retrievedTime - testTime) < 10000, "Set timestamp should be approximately correct");
    }

    // ========== Path and URL Operations ==========

    @Test
    void testPathOperations() throws Exception {
        SmbFile file = new SmbFile(baseUrl + "shared/path/file.txt", context);

    return file(new File(first), more);
  }

  /** Returns a {@code File} object for the given path parts. */
  private static File file(File first, String... more) {
    // not very efficient, but should definitely be correct
    File file = first;
    for (String name : more) {
      file = new File(file, name);
    }
    return file;
  }