public static <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] newArray(Class<@NonNull T> type, int length) {
    return (T[]) Array.newInstance(type, length);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new array of the given length with the same type as a reference array.
   *
   * @param reference any array of the desired type
   * @param length the length of the new array
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] newArray(T[] reference, int length) {

  /**
   * Chooses and returns the representative instance for any of a collection of instances that are
   * equal to each other. If two {@linkplain Object#equals equal} inputs are given to this method,
   * both calls will return the same instance. That is, {@code intern(a).equals(a)} always holds,
   * and {@code intern(a) == intern(b)} if and only if {@code a.equals(b)}. Note that {@code

# restriction that load() statements need to be at the top of .bzl files.
# E.g. we can not retrieve a new repository with http_archive and then load()
# a macro from that repository in the same file.
load("@//tensorflow:workspace3.bzl", "tf_workspace3")

tf_workspace3()

load("@rules_shell//shell:repositories.bzl", "rules_shell_dependencies", "rules_shell_toolchains")

rules_shell_dependencies()

        assertTrue(item1.isPresent());

        // Modify the same item with different values
        CharMappingItem updateItem1 = item1.get();
        updateItem1.setNewInputs(new String[] { "m", "n" });
        updateItem1.setNewOutput("o");

        // Create another update for the same item
        CharMappingItem updateItem2 = new CharMappingItem(1L, new String[] { "x", "y" }, "z");

		&Account{Number: "account-slice-append-2"},
		&Account{Number: "account-slice-append-3"},
	)

	AssertAssociationCount(t, users, "Account", 3, "After Append")

	// Replace -> same as append

	// Delete
	if err := DB.Model(&users).Association("Account").Delete(&users[0].Account); err != nil {
		t.Errorf("no error should happened when deleting account, but got %v", err)
	}

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

   * Calling this method is as thread-safe as calling that method.
   *
   * @param collection a collection of {@code Number} instances
   * @return an array containing the same values as {@code collection}, in the same order, converted
   *     to primitives
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code collection} or any of its elements is null
   * @since 1.0 (parameter was {@code Collection<Long>} before 12.0)
   */

        1 ^ e0().hashCode(),
        getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

  public void testEquals_yes() {
    assertTrue(
        "multiset doesn't equal a multiset with the same elements",
        getMultiset().equals(HashMultiset.create(getSampleElements())));
  }

  public void testEquals_differentSize() {
    Multiset<E> other = HashMultiset.create(getSampleElements());
    other.add(e0());

        1 ^ e0().hashCode(),
        getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

  public void testEquals_yes() {
    assertTrue(
        "multiset doesn't equal a multiset with the same elements",
        getMultiset().equals(HashMultiset.create(getSampleElements())));
  }

  public void testEquals_differentSize() {
    Multiset<E> other = HashMultiset.create(getSampleElements());
    other.add(e0());

    for (int i = 0; i < 11; i++) {
      limiter.acquire(); // #7, showing off the warmup starting from totally cold
    }

    // make sure the areas (times) remain the same, while permits are different
    assertEvents(
        "R0.00, R1.38, R1.13, R0.88, R0.63, R0.50, R0.50, R0.50", // #1
        "U4.50", // #2
        "R0.00, R1.38, R1.13", // #3, after that the rate changes