throw new IOException("Connection not established");
        }

        try {
            // In real implementation, this would send using DiSNI:
            // DisniMemoryRegion disniRegion = (DisniMemoryRegion) region;
            // IbvSendWR sendWR = new IbvSendWR();
            // sendWR.setWr_id(System.nanoTime());

{* ../../docs_src/additional_responses/tutorial002.py hl[19:24,28] *}

/// note

Notice that you have to return the image using a `FileResponse` directly.

///

/// info

 */

package jcifs.dcerpc.msrpc;

/**
 * MSRPC implementation for looking up security identifiers (SIDs).
 * This class provides functionality to resolve SIDs to their corresponding
 * account names using the LSA RPC interface.
 */
public class MsrpcLookupSids extends jcifs.dcerpc.msrpc.lsarpc.LsarLookupSids {

    /**
     * Creates a new request to lookup SIDs.
     *
     * @param policyHandle the LSA policy handle

 */

package jcifs.dcerpc.msrpc;

import jcifs.dcerpc.rpc;

/**
 * MSRPC implementation for opening a domain handle.
 * This class provides functionality to open a handle to a SAM domain
 * using the SAMR RPC interface.
 */
public class MsrpcSamrOpenDomain extends samr.SamrOpenDomain {

    /**
     * Creates a new request to open a domain handle.
     *
     * @param handle the SAM policy handle

  /**
   * Creates a {@code CollectorTester} for the specified {@code Collector}. The result of the {@code
   * Collector} will be compared to the expected value using {@link Object#equals}.
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, A extends @Nullable Object, R extends @Nullable Object>
      CollectorTester<T, A, R> of(Collector<T, A, R> collector) {

# Separate OpenAPI Schemas for Input and Output or Not { #separate-openapi-schemas-for-input-and-output-or-not }

When using **Pydantic v2**, the generated OpenAPI is a bit more exact and **correct** than before. 😎

In fact, in some cases, it will even have **two JSON Schemas** in OpenAPI for the same Pydantic model, for input and output, depending on if they have **default values**.

Let's see how that works and how to change it if you need to do that.

   * could use null, but that messes with our nullness checking, including under J2KT. We could
   * probably work around it by changing how we annotate the J2CL EnumMap, but that's probably more
   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use
   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields

        }
        return availableSearchers;
    }

    /**
     * Performs concurrent searches using multiple searchers and fuses the results.
     * Executes searches in parallel across all provided searchers, then combines the results
     * using rank fusion algorithms to produce a unified result set.
     *
     * @param searchers array of searchers to use for concurrent searching

        ImmutableList.of(
            ListTestSuiteBuilder.using(new ImmutableLongArrayAsListGenerator())
                .named("ImmutableLongArray.asList"),
            ListTestSuiteBuilder.using(new ImmutableLongArrayHeadSubListAsListGenerator())
                .named("ImmutableLongArray.asList, head subList"),
            ListTestSuiteBuilder.using(new ImmutableLongArrayTailSubListAsListGenerator())

	if len(users1) != 3 {
		t.Errorf("should find two users using left join, but got %v", len(users1))
	}

	var users2 []User
	DB.Joins("inner join pets on pets.user_id = users.id AND pets.name = ?", user.Pets[0].Name).Where("users.name = ?", user.Name).First(&users2)
	if len(users2) != 1 {
		t.Errorf("should find one users using left join with conditions, but got %v", len(users2))
	}

	var users3 []User