// A src.Int63() generates 63 random bits, enough for letterIdxMax characters!
	for i, cache, remain := n-1, src.Int63(), letterIdxMax; i >= 0; {
		if remain == 0 {
			cache, remain = src.Int63(), letterIdxMax
		}
		if idx := int(cache & letterIdxMask); idx < len(letterBytes) {
			b[i] = letterBytes[idx]
			i--
		}
		cache >>= letterIdxBits
		remain--
	}

	return *(*string)(unsafe.Pointer(&b))
}

        }).orElse(StringUtil.EMPTY_STRINGS);
    }

    /**
     * Retrieves or creates the result document IDs cache from the session.
     * The cache is implemented as an LRU map to limit memory usage.
     *
     * @param session the HTTP session
     * @return the result document IDs cache map
     */
    private Map<String, String[]> getResultDocIdsCache(final HttpSession session) {

  they are snapshot versions; artifact deployment cannot take place; certain
  types of tests cannot be setup, since the container used to run them cannot be
  reached or started.

  All of these operations will produce their own unique errors in the absence of
  a coordinated offline strategy. In addition, efforts to unite these failing

   *
   * On the other hand, past underutilization could mean that "the server responsible for handling
   * the request has become less ready for future requests", i.e. its caches become stale, and
   * requests become more likely to trigger expensive operations (a more extreme case of this
   * example is when a server has just booted, and it is mostly busy with getting itself up to
   * speed).
   *

Example:

```sh

   * <i>might</i> perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse. Note
   * that no character encoding is performed; the low byte and high byte of each {@code char} are
   * hashed directly (in that order).
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> This method will produce different output than most other languages do when
   * running the same hash function on the equivalent input. For cross-language compatibility, use

   * <i>might</i> perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse. Note
   * that no character encoding is performed; the low byte and high byte of each {@code char} are
   * hashed directly (in that order).
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> This method will produce different output than most other languages do when
   * running the same hash function on the equivalent input. For cross-language compatibility, use

   *   <li>If the first character was a high surrogate value, then an attempt is made to read the
   *       next character.
   *       <ol>
   *         <li><b>If the end of the sequence was reached, the negated value of the trailing high
   *             surrogate is returned.</b>
   *         <li><b>If the next character was a valid low surrogate, the code point value of the

        testBlock = new TestAndXServerMessageBlock(mockConfig, (byte) 0x25, andxBlock) {
            @Override
            protected int getBatchLimit(Configuration cfg, byte cmd) {
                return 1; // Allow one batched message
            }
        };

        byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];
        int length = testBlock.encode(buffer, 0);

        assertTrue(length > 0);

                    return ImmutableMultiset.<String>builder().add(elements).buildJdkBacked();
                  }
                })
            .named("ImmutableMultiset [JDK backed]")
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ANY,
                CollectionFeature.SERIALIZABLE_INCLUDING_VIEWS,
                CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_QUERIES)
            .createTestSuite());