Я проверил несколько идей на самых популярных редакторах кода: PyCharm, VS Code, редакторы на базе Jedi.

Согласно последнему [опросу Python-разработчиков](https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools), который охватывает около 80% пользователей.

          DEX_ISSUER: "http://127.0.0.1:5557/dex"
          DEX_WEB_HTTP: "0.0.0.0:5557"

    strategy:
      # When ldap, etcd or openid vars are empty below, those external servers
      # are turned off - i.e. if ldap="", then ldap server is not enabled for
      # the tests.
      matrix:
        go-version: [1.24.x]
        ldap: ["", "localhost:389"]
        etcd: ["", "http://localhost:2379"]

}

// Disable before debugging non-obvious errors from the type-checker.
const usePkgCache = true

var (
	pkgCache = map[string]*apiPackage{} // map tagKey to package
	pkgTags  = map[string][]string{}    // map import dir to list of relevant tags
)

// tagKey returns the tag-based key to use in the pkgCache.
// It is a comma-separated string; the first part is dir, the rest tags.

Ich habe mehrere Ideen in den beliebtesten Python-Editoren getestet: PyCharm, VS Code, Jedi-basierte Editoren.

Laut der letzten [Python-Entwickler-Umfrage](https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools) deckt das etwa 80 % der Benutzer ab.

Çeşitli fikirleri en popüler Python editörlerinde test ettim: PyCharm, VS Code, Jedi tabanlı editörler.

Bu test, en son [Python Geliştirici Anketi](https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools)'ine göre, kullanıcıların yaklaşık %80'inin kullandığı editörleri kapsıyor.

Uygulamanıza giriş yapan kullanıcılar yok da robotlar, botlar veya yalnızca bir access token'a sahip başka sistemler mi var? Yine, her şey aynı şekilde çalışır.

Uygulamanız için neye ihtiyacınız varsa o türden bir model, class ve veritabanı kullanın. **FastAPI**, dependency injection sistemiyle bunları destekler.

## Kod boyutu { #code-size }

      }
    }

    @Override
    public NavigableMap<K, V> headMap(K toKey, boolean inclusive) {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return navigableMap(delegate().headMap(toKey, inclusive), mutex);
      }
    }

    @Override
    public SortedMap<K, V> headMap(K toKey) {
      return headMap(toKey, false);
    }

    @Override

      }
    }

    @Override
    public NavigableMap<K, V> headMap(K toKey, boolean inclusive) {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return navigableMap(delegate().headMap(toKey, inclusive), mutex);
      }
    }

    @Override
    public SortedMap<K, V> headMap(K toKey) {
      return headMap(toKey, false);
    }

    @Override

J'ai testé plusieurs idées dans les éditeurs Python les plus populaires : PyCharm, VS Code, les éditeurs basés sur Jedi.

D'après la dernière [Enquête Développeurs Python](https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools), cela couvre environ 80% des utilisateurs.

## 設計 { #design }

接著，我花時間設計作為使用者（作為使用 FastAPI 的開發者）時希望擁有的開發者「API」。

我在最受歡迎的 Python 編輯器中測試了多個想法：PyCharm、VS Code、基於 Jedi 的編輯器。

根據最新的 [Python 開發者調查](https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools)，這些工具涵蓋約 80% 的使用者。

這表示 **FastAPI** 已針對 80% 的 Python 開發者所使用的編輯器進行過專門測試。而由於其他多數編輯器的行為也類似，這些優點擴及實際上幾乎所有編輯器。

藉此我找到了盡可能減少程式碼重複、在各處提供自動補全、型別與錯誤檢查等的最佳方式。

一切都是為了讓所有開發者都能擁有最佳的開發體驗。