* ReadWriteLock implementation whose read and write locks retain a reference back to this lock.
   * Otherwise, a reference to just the read lock or just the write lock would not suffice to ensure
   * the {@code ReadWriteLock} is retained.
   */
  private static final class WeakSafeReadWriteLock implements ReadWriteLock {
    private final ReadWriteLock delegate;

    WeakSafeReadWriteLock() {
      this.delegate = new ReentrantReadWriteLock();

    String jacksons = "arfo(Marlon)aorf, (Michael)orfa, afro(Jackie)orfa, ofar(Jemaine), aff(Tito)";
    Iterable<String> family =
        COMMA_SPLITTER
            .trimResults(CharMatcher.anyOf("afro").or(CharMatcher.whitespace()))
            .split(jacksons);
    assertThat(family)
        .containsExactly("(Marlon)", "(Michael)", "(Jackie)", "(Jemaine)", "(Tito)")
        .inOrder();
  }

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("MonotonicClock start time should remain constant")
    void testStartTime() throws InterruptedException {
        Instant start1 = MonotonicClock.start();
        Thread.sleep(10);
        Instant start2 = MonotonicClock.start();

        assertEquals(start1, start2, "Start time should remain constant");
        assertNotNull(start1, "Start time should not be null");
    }

                log.debug("Server " + dr.server + " path " + reqPath + " remain " + reqPath.substring(consumed) + " path consumed "
                        + consumed);
            }
            dr.pathConsumed = consumed;
        } else {
            if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
                log.debug("Node " + ref.getNode() + " path " + reqPath + " remain " + reqPath.substring(consumed) + " path consumed "

   * <ul>
   *   <li>It is <i>consistent</i>: for any reference {@code x}, multiple invocations of {@code
   *       hash(x}} consistently return the same value provided {@code x} remains unchanged
   *       according to the definition of the equivalence. The hash need not remain consistent from
   *       one execution of an application to another execution of the same application.

        if (result < 0) {
          result = UnsignedLongs.remainder(result, m);
        }
        // result < 2^63 again
        result += aLo * bHi; // aLo * bHi < 2^63, result < 2^64
        result = times2ToThe32Mod(result, m); // result < m < 2^63
        return plusMod(result, UnsignedLongs.remainder(aLo * bLo /* < 2^64 */, m), m);
      }

      @Override

        for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
            assertEquals(src[off + i], dst[dstIndex + i], "Byte mismatch at " + i);
        }

        // Assert: bytes before and after region remain unchanged.
        for (int i = 0; i < dstIndex; i++) {
            assertEquals((byte) 0x55, dst[i], "Unexpected change before copy region at " + i);
        }
        for (int i = dstIndex + len; i < dst.length; i++) {

// For each call, unfreezeServices must be called once.
func freezeServices() {
	// Use atomics for globalServiceFreeze, so we can read without locking.
	// We need a lock since we are need the 2 atomic values to remain in sync.
	globalServiceFreezeMu.Lock()
	// If multiple calls, first one creates channel.
	globalServiceFreezeCnt++
	if globalServiceFreezeCnt == 1 {
		globalServiceFreeze.Store(make(chan struct{}))
	}

       *
       * Maybe there is a way to avoid this cycle. But we think the cycle is safe enough to ignore:
       * Each task is retained for only as long as it is running -- so it's retained only as long as
       * it would already be retained by the underlying executor.
       *
       * If the cycle test starts reporting this cycle in the future, we should add an entry to
       * cycle_suppress_list.txt.

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A {@code UnicodeEscaper} that escapes some set of Java characters using a UTF-8 based percent
 * encoding scheme. The set of safe characters (those which remain unescaped) can be specified on
 * construction.
 *
 * <p>This class is primarily used for creating URI escapers in {@link UrlEscapers} but can be used