<exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

import java.time.temporal.ChronoField.SECOND_OF_MINUTE
import java.util.logging.Formatter
import java.util.logging.LogRecord

/**
 * Is Java8 Data and Time really this bad, or is writing this on a plane from just javadocs a bad
 * idea?
 *
 * Why so much construction?
 */
class OneLineLogFormat : Formatter() {
  private val d =
    DateTimeFormatterBuilder()
      .appendValue(HOUR_OF_DAY, 2)

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

 * java.util.Collections#sort(java.util.List) Collections.sort(List<Double>)} and selecting
 * the required value(s). Those methods would sort {@link Double#NaN NaN} as if it is greater than
 * any other value and place them at the end of the dataset, even after {@link
 * Double#POSITIVE_INFINITY POSITIVE_INFINITY}.)
 *
 * <p>Otherwise, {@link Double#NEGATIVE_INFINITY NEGATIVE_INFINITY} and {@link

  // mode.
  static int collectionIteratorTesterNumIterations() {
    return 3;
  }

  // TODO: Consolidate different copies in one single place.
  static String format(String template, Object... args) {
    // start substituting the arguments into the '%s' placeholders
    StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(template.length() + 16 * args.length);

  /**
   * Returns the iteration ordering of elements, given the order in which they were added to the
   * container. This method may return the original list unchanged, the original list modified in
   * place, or a different list.
   *
   * <p>If the order is non-deterministic, as with {@link java.util.HashSet}, this method can return
   * its input unmodified. Provided that the test suite is built without {@link

import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Locale;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Since annotations have some reusability issues that force copy and paste all over the place, it's
 * worth having a test to ensure that all our Feature enums have their annotations correctly set up.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
public class FeatureEnumTest extends TestCase {

    bulkGetSet = ImmutableList.copyOf(limit(cycle(asList), 10));
  }

  @Footprint
  Object sizeOfStriped() {
    return impl.get(numStripes);
  }

  // a place to put the locks in sizeOfPopulatedStriped so they don't get GC'd before we measure
  final List<Lock> locks = new ArrayList<>(numStripes);

  @Footprint
  Object sizeOfPopulatedStriped() {
    locks.clear();