* non-static, and is initialized/removed frequently - this causes churn in the Thread specific
   * hashmaps. Using a static ThreadLocal to avoid that overhead would mean that different
   * ExecutionSequencer objects interfere with each other, which would be undesirable, in addition
   * to increasing the memory footprint of every thread that interacted with it. In order to release

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/** Unit tests for CacheBuilder. */
@GwtCompatible
// We are intentionally testing the TimeUnit overloads, too.
@SuppressWarnings("LongTimeUnit_ExpireAfterWrite_Seconds")
@NullUnmarked
public class CacheBuilderTest extends TestCase {

  public void testNewBuilder() {

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/** Unit tests for CacheBuilder. */
@GwtCompatible
// We are intentionally testing the TimeUnit overloads, too.
@SuppressWarnings("LongTimeUnit_ExpireAfterWrite_Seconds")
@NullUnmarked
public class CacheBuilderTest extends TestCase {

  public void testNewBuilder() {

    fun addInterceptor(interceptor: Interceptor) =
      apply {
        interceptors += interceptor
      }

    @JvmName("-addInterceptor") // Prefix with '-' to prevent ambiguous overloads from Java.
    inline fun addInterceptor(crossinline block: (chain: Interceptor.Chain) -> Response) =
      addInterceptor(Interceptor { chain -> block(chain) })

    /**

   *       userspace buffer (byte[] or ByteBuffer), then copies them from that buffer into the
   *       destination channel.
   * </ol>
   *
   * This value is intended to be large enough to make the overhead of system calls negligible,
   * without being so large that it causes problems for systems with atypical memory management if
   * approaches 2 or 3 are used.
   */
  private static final int ZERO_COPY_CHUNK_SIZE = 512 * 1024;

- Introduction of the pod overhead feature to the scheduler. This functionality is alpha-level as of

 *
 * <h4>Combining</h4>
 *
 * To derive a {@code ClosingFuture} from two or more input steps, pass the input steps to {@link
 * #whenAllComplete(Iterable)} or {@link #whenAllSucceed(Iterable)} or its overloads.
 *
 * <h3>Cancelling</h3>
 *
 * Any step in a pipeline can be {@linkplain #cancel(boolean) cancelled}, even after another step
 * has been derived, with the same semantics as cancelling a {@link Future}. In addition, a

- File descriptors are leaked in docker v1.11 ([#275](https://github.com/docker/containerd/issues/275))
- Additional memory overhead per container in docker v1.11 ([#21737](https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/21737))
- [List of upstream fixes](https://github.com/docker/docker/compare/v1.10.3...runcom:docker-1.10.3-stable) for docker v1.10 identified by RedHat

      which can be identified by the [node problem detector](http://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/node-problem/)
    - Leaked File descriptors ([#275](https://github.com/docker/containerd/issues/275))
    - Additional memory overhead per container ([#21737]((https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/21737))

 *
 * <h4>Combining</h4>
 *
 * To derive a {@code ClosingFuture} from two or more input steps, pass the input steps to {@link
 * #whenAllComplete(Iterable)} or {@link #whenAllSucceed(Iterable)} or its overloads.
 *
 * <h3>Cancelling</h3>
 *
 * Any step in a pipeline can be {@linkplain #cancel(boolean) cancelled}, even after another step
 * has been derived, with the same semantics as cancelling a {@link Future}. In addition, a