protected
    fun assertChangesProperlyOrdered() {
        val result = run(":verifyAcceptedApiChangesOrdering").build()
        Assertions.assertEquals(TaskOutcome.SUCCESS, result.task(":verifyAcceptedApiChangesOrdering")!!.outcome)
    }

    protected
    fun assertHasMisorderedChanges(changes: List<Change>? = null) {
        val standardError = StringWriter()
        run(":verifyAcceptedApiChangesOrdering")

However, for the vast majority of issues, we aim to empower individuals to first resolve conflicts themselves, asking for help when needed, and only after that fails to escalate further. This approach gives people more control over the outcome of their dispute. 

If you are experiencing or witnessing conflict, we ask you to use the following escalation strategy to address the conflict:

1.  Address the perceived conflict directly with those involved, preferably in a

$ go run web-identity.go -cid 204367807228-ok7601k6gj1pgge7m09h7d79co8p35xx.apps.googleusercontent.com -csec XsT_PgPdT1nO9DD45rMLJw7G
2018/12/26 17:49:36 listening on http://localhost:8080/
```

> NOTE: for a reasonable test outcome, make sure the assumed user has at least permission/policy to list all buckets. That policy would look like below:

```
{
  "version": "2012-10-17",
  "statement": [
    {
      "effect": "Allow",

			versionID:      uuid.NewString(),
			objectModTime:  time.Now().UTC().Add(-10 * 24 * time.Hour), // Created 10 days ago
			expectedAction: NoneAction,
		},
		// Disabled rules with NewerNoncurrentVersions shouldn't affect outcome.
		{

	trash := strings.Repeat("garbage ", 64) // Exactly 512 bytes

	vectors := []struct {
		input string // Input stream
		cnt   int    // Expected number of headers read
		err   error  // Expected error outcome
	}{
		{"", 0, io.EOF}, // Empty file is a "valid" tar file
		{data1[:511], 0, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF},
		{data1[:512], 1, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF},
		{data1[:1024], 1, io.EOF},
		{data1[:1536], 2, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF},

				Description: MetricDescription{
					Namespace: nodeMetricNamespace,
					Subsystem: ilmSubsystem,
					Name:      MetricName("action_count_" + toSnake(action.String())),
					Help:      "Total action outcome of lifecycle checks since server uptime",
					Type:      counterMetric,
				},
				Value: float64(v),
			})
		}
		return metrics
	})
	return mg
}

  If rule evaluation uses more compute than the limit, the API server aborts the evaluation and the
  admission check that was being performed is aborted; the `failurePolicy` for the ValidatingAdmissionPolicy
  determines the outcome. ([#115747](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/115747), [@cici37](https://github.com/cici37))
- Added `auditAnnotations` to `ValidatingAdmissionPolicy`, enabling CEL to be used to add audit annotations to request audit events.