@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // using raw types to avoid a bug in our nullness checker :(
        InternalEntry entry = map.getEntry(sample);
        if (entry != null) {
          Object canonical = entry.getKey();
          if (canonical != null) { // only matters if weak/soft keys are used
            // The compiler would know this is safe if not for our use of raw types (see above).
            @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")

import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests our AtomicHelper fallback strategies in AbstractFuture.
 *
 * <p>On different platforms AbstractFuture uses different strategies for its core synchronization

         * only way to get a TypeVariable instance for the resolved types is to create our own. The
         * created TypeVariable will not interoperate with any JDK TypeVariable. But this is OK: We
         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new

[guava.dev/api](https://guava.dev/api). You can also jump right to a specific
class by appending the class name to guava.dev. For example,
[guava.dev/ImmutableList](https://guava.dev/ImmutableList)!

## Learn about Guava

-   Our users' guide, [Guava Explained]
-   [A nice collection](https://www.tfnico.com/presentations/google-guava) of
    other helpful links

## Links

-   [GitHub project](https://github.com/google/guava)

********************************************************************************

## TensorFlow's Official CI and Build/Test Scripts

TensorFlow's official CI jobs run the scripts in this folder. Our internal CI
system, Kokoro, schedules our CI jobs by combining a build script with a file
from the `envs` directory that is filled with configuration options:

-   Nightly jobs (Run nightly on the `nightly` branch)

        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our
        users indicates that they really appreciate Guava's high power-to-weight ratio. It's
        important to us to keep Guava as easy to use and understand as we can. That means boiling

         * only way to get a TypeVariable instance for the resolved types is to create our own. The
         * created TypeVariable will not interoperate with any JDK TypeVariable. But this is OK: We
         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new

package zip_test

import (
	"archive/zip"
	"bytes"
	"compress/flate"
	"fmt"
	"io"
	"log"
	"os"
)

func ExampleWriter() {
	// Create a buffer to write our archive to.
	buf := new(bytes.Buffer)

	// Create a new zip archive.
	w := zip.NewWriter(buf)

	// Add some files to the archive.
	var files = []struct {
		Name, Body string
	}{

   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>We could change the serialization of this class incompatibly. We have reserved the right
   *       to make such changes to our serialized forms, and we have made them before, usually
   *       without trouble. In this case, my guess is that our chosen approach is even less likely
   *       to lead to trouble than an incompatible change would be.

title: ''
labels: enhancement
assignees: ''

---

Start by telling us what problem you’re trying to solve. Often a solution already exists!