when(mockDelegate.getMaximumVersion()).thenReturn(null);

        // When & Then - should handle nulls gracefully
        assertNull(delegatingConfig.getRandom(), "Should return null when delegate returns null");
        assertNull(delegatingConfig.getLocalAddr(), "Should return null when delegate returns null");
        assertNull(delegatingConfig.getNetbiosHostname(), "Should return null when delegate returns null");

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

            this.releases = new LinkedList<>();
        } else {
            this.acquires = null;
            this.releases = null;
        }
    }

    boolean matches(final String shr, final String servc) {
        return this.share.equalsIgnoreCase(shr) && (servc == null || servc.startsWith("??") || this.service.equalsIgnoreCase(servc));
    }

    @Override

                }
            }
        } finally {
            this.open = false;
            if (t != null) {
                // release tree usage
                t.release();
            }
            this.tree = null;
        }
    }

    /**
     * {@inheritDoc}
     *
     * @see jcifs.SmbFileHandle#close()
     */
    @Override

  /**
   * Visits the given types. Null types are ignored. This allows subclasses to call {@code
   * visit(parameterizedType.getOwnerType())} safely without having to check nulls.
   */
  public final void visit(@Nullable Type... types) {
    for (Type type : types) {
      if (type == null || !visited.add(type)) {
        // null owner type, or already visited;
        continue;
      }

 * exceptions whenever it can.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public class MinimalCollection<E extends @Nullable Object> extends AbstractCollection<E> {
  // TODO: expose allow nulls parameter?

  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> MinimalCollection<E> of(E... contents) {
    return new MinimalCollection<>(Object.class, true, contents);
  }

  // TODO: use this

  @Override
  public boolean contains(@Nullable Object target) {
    @Nullable Object[] table = this.table;
    if (target == null || table.length == 0) {
      return false;
    }
    for (int i = smearedHash(target); ; i++) {
      i &= mask;
      Object candidate = table[i];
      if (candidate == null) {
        return false;
      } else if (candidate.equals(target)) {
        return true;
      }
    }
  }

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

        smbComOpenAndX.useUnicode = true;
        // For Unicode: 1 byte (initial null in writeBytesWireFormat)
        // + potential 1 byte alignment (in writeString) + fileName.length() * 2 + 2 bytes (terminating nulls)
        // Since headerStart is 0 and dstIndex starts at 1 (after initial null), (1-0)%2=1, so alignment byte added
        // Total: 1 + 1 + 12*2 + 2 = 28 bytes

    if (node == null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      delete(node);
      node.prevInKeyInsertionOrder = null;
      node.nextInKeyInsertionOrder = null;
      return node.value;
    }
  }

  @Override
  public void clear() {
    size = 0;
    Arrays.fill(hashTableKToV, null);
    Arrays.fill(hashTableVToK, null);
    firstInKeyInsertionOrder = null;