* need to clear our reference to the TimeoutFuture is the reason we use a *static* nested
       * class with a manual reference back to the "containing" class.)
       *
       * This has the nice-ish side effect of limiting reentrancy: run() calls
       * timeoutFuture.setException() calls run(). That reentrancy would already be harmless, since

    Collections.shuffle(hashCodes);
    HashCode hashCode2 = Hashing.combineUnordered(hashCodes);

    assertEquals(hashCode1, hashCode2);
  }

  // This isn't specified by contract, but it'll still be nice to know if this behavior changes.
  public void testConcatenating_equals() {
    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(Hashing.concatenating(asList(Hashing.md5())))

              @Override
              protected SortedMap<String, String> create(Entry<String, String>[] entries) {
                /*
                 * TODO(cpovirk): it would be nice to create an input Map and use
                 * the copy constructor here and in the other tests
                 */
                return populate(new TreeMap<String, String>(), entries);
              }

    Collections.shuffle(hashCodes);
    HashCode hashCode2 = Hashing.combineUnordered(hashCodes);

    assertEquals(hashCode1, hashCode2);
  }

  // This isn't specified by contract, but it'll still be nice to know if this behavior changes.
  public void testConcatenating_equals() {
    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(Hashing.concatenating(asList(Hashing.md5())))

              @Override
              protected SortedMap<String, String> create(Entry<String, String>[] entries) {
                /*
                 * TODO(cpovirk): it would be nice to create an input Map and use
                 * the copy constructor here and in the other tests
                 */
                return populate(new TreeMap<String, String>(), entries);
              }

           * within a `try` block, then an error might be thrown even before we enter the `try`
           * block: https://github.com/google/truth/issues/333#issuecomment-765652454
           *
           * Also, it's nice that this approach should let us catch *only* ClassNotFoundException
           * instead of having to catch more broadly (potentially even including, say, a
           * StackOverflowError).
           */

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>surefire.toolchain.version</name>
          <!-- the value provided by GitHub CI (which maybe we could even change, but supporting "8" seems nice for any users who try pass that value manually) -->
          <value>8</value>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.opens></test.add.opens>
      </properties>

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>surefire.toolchain.version</name>
          <!-- the value provided by GitHub CI (which maybe we could even change, but supporting "8" seems nice for any users who try pass that value manually) -->
          <value>8</value>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.opens></test.add.opens>
      </properties>

         * unlikely that cancel() will be slow, so we can probably get away with calling it while
         * holding a lock. Still, it would be nice to avoid somehow.
         */
        lock.lock();
        try {
          currentFuture.cancel(mayInterruptIfRunning);
        } finally {
          lock.unlock();
        }
      }

              .on('mousedown.daterangepicker', this._outsideClickProxy)
              // also support mobile devices
              .on('touchend.daterangepicker', this._outsideClickProxy)
              // also explicitly play nice with Bootstrap dropdowns, which stopPropagation when clicking them
              .on('click.daterangepicker', '[data-toggle=dropdown]', this._outsideClickProxy)