// timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

  @Override

   * invokeAny} which are pending serial execution, even the subset of the tasks that have not yet
   * started execution. It is unclear from the {@code ExecutorService} specification if these should
   * be included, and it's much easier to implement the interpretation that they not be. Finally, a
   * call to {@code shutdown} or {@code shutdownNow} may result in concurrent calls to {@code

import java.math.BigInteger;
import java.util.Random;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Utilities for benchmarks.
 *
 * <p>In many cases, we wish to vary the order of magnitude of the input as much as we want to vary
 * the input itself, so most methods which generate values use an exponential distribution varying
 * the order of magnitude of the generated values uniformly at random.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */

            assertTrue(scheduler.containsKey("running"));
            isRunning = (Boolean) scheduler.get("running");

        }
        if (300 <= count) {
            logger.info("Time out: Crawler takes too much time");
            //TODO fail(); // Time Out
        }

        logger.info("Crawler terminated");
    }

    protected static String createWebConfig(final Map<String, Object> requestBody) {

 * client. Applications may use this class to monitor HTTP connections as members of a
 * [connection pool][ConnectionPool].
 *
 * Do not confuse this class with the misnamed `HttpURLConnection`, which isn't so much a connection
 * as a single request/response exchange.
 *
 * ## Modern TLS
 *
 * There are trade-offs when selecting which options to include when negotiating a secure connection

Your server(s) is (are) a **resource**, you can consume or **utilize**, with your programs, the computation time on the CPUs, and the RAM memory available.

How much of the system resources do you want to be consuming/utilizing? It might be easy to think "not much", but in reality, you will probably want to consume **as much as possible without crashing**.

        * **FastAPI**: (uses Starlette) an API microframework with several additional features for building APIs, with data validation, etc.

* **Uvicorn**:
    * Will have the best performance, as it doesn't have much extra code apart from the server itself.

   * and use that list instead.
   */
  public List<Long> asList() {
    /*
     * Typically we cache this kind of thing, but much repeated use of this view is a performance
     * anti-pattern anyway. If we cache, then everyone pays a price in memory footprint even if
     * they never use this method.
     */
    return new AsList(this);
  }

   * ImmutableList.copyOf} and use that list instead.
   */
  public List<Integer> asList() {
    /*
     * Typically we cache this kind of thing, but much repeated use of this view is a performance
     * anti-pattern anyway. If we cache, then everyone pays a price in memory footprint even if
     * they never use this method.
     */
    return new AsList(this);
  }

This way, containers consume **little resources**, an amount comparable to running the processes directly (a virtual machine would consume much more).

Containers also have their own **isolated** running processes (commonly just one process), file system, and network, simplifying deployment, security, development, etc.