* {@code throws} clause: Some such methods can in fact throw a checked exception (e.g., by
   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link

   * {@code throws} clause: Some such methods can in fact throw a checked exception (e.g., by
   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link

import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Map;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

/**
 * Test {@code TreeMultimap.asMap().subMap()} with {@link MapInterfaceTest}.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public class SubMapMultimapAsMapImplementsMapTest extends AbstractMultimapAsMapImplementsMapTest {

  public SubMapMultimapAsMapImplementsMapTest() {
    super(true, true, true);
  }

 * ImmutableCollection}, such as {@link ImmutableList}. You can, however, convert an existing
 * iterator to an {@code UnmodifiableIterator} using {@link Iterators#unmodifiableIterator}.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public abstract class UnmodifiableIterator<E extends @Nullable Object> implements Iterator<E> {
  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected UnmodifiableIterator() {}

import com.google.common.collect.testing.SampleElements.Strings;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Queue;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

/**
 * Create queue of strings for tests.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public abstract class TestStringQueueGenerator implements TestQueueGenerator<String> {
  @Override
  public SampleElements<String> samples() {
    return new Strings();
  }

   * has three properties, {@code x}, {@code y}, and {@code z}, one could write:
   *
   * {@snippet :
   * public int hashCode() {
   *   return Objects.hashCode(getX(), getY(), getZ());
   * }
   * }
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> When a single object is supplied, the returned hash code does not equal the
   * hash code of that object.
   *

import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * A generic JUnit test which tests multiset-specific read operations. Can't be invoked directly;
 * please see {@link com.google.common.collect.testing.SetTestSuiteBuilder}.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.

import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * A generic JUnit test which tests multiset-specific read operations. Can't be invoked directly;
 * please see {@link com.google.common.collect.testing.SetTestSuiteBuilder}.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.

const nextElement = element || activeElement &&\n      this._getItemByDirection(direction, activeElement)\n    const nextElementIndex = this._getItemIndex(nextElement)\n    const isCycling = Boolean(this._interval)\n\n    let directionalClassName\n    let orderClassName\n    let eventDirectionName\n\n    if (direction === DIRECTION_NEXT) {\n      directionalClassName = CLASS_NAME_LEFT\n      orderClassName = CLASS_NAME_NEXT\n      eventDirectionName = DIRECTION_LEFT\n    } else {\n      directionalClassName...

 *       .where(new TypeParameter<T>() {}, elementType);
 * }
 * }
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 * @since 12.0
 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could