}

    @Override
    public void setPriority(int priority) {
        throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }

    @Override
    public String getDescription() {
        return "Reports incorrect usages of integration test fixtures";
    }

    @Override
    protected Class<?> getAstVisitorClass() {
        return IntegrationTestFixtureVisitor.class;
    }

		},
		7: {
			desc:       "Correct sha256, nested, truncated, swapped",
			src:        mustReader(t, bytes.NewReader([]byte("abcd-more-stuff-to-be ignored")), 4, "", "", -1),
			size:       4,
			actualSize: -1,
			sha256hex:  "88d4266fd4e6338d13b845fcf289579d209c897823b9217da3e161936f031589",
			err:        ioutil.ErrOverread,
		},
		{
			desc:       "Incorrect MD5, nested",

    class GetterTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("getPtype should return correct packet type")
        void testGetPtype() {
            message.ptype = DcerpcConstants.RPC_PT_REQUEST;
            assertEquals(DcerpcConstants.RPC_PT_REQUEST, message.getPtype());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("getFlags should return correct flags")
        void testGetFlags() {

* Read the body of the request as JSON.
* Convert the corresponding types (if needed).
* Validate the data.
    * If the data is invalid, it will return a nice and clear error, indicating exactly where and what was the incorrect data.
* Give you the received data in the parameter `item`.
    * As you declared it in the function to be of type `Item`, you will also have all the editor support (completion, etc) for all of the attributes and their types.

                    + " Optional=" + (artifact.isOptional() ? "true" : "false"));
            assertTrue(
                    artifact.getVersion().equals("1.0"), "Incorrect version for " + artifact.getDependencyConflictId());
        }
    }

                    + " Scope: " + artifact.getScope());
            assertTrue(
                    artifact.getVersion().equals("1.0"), "Incorrect version for " + artifact.getDependencyConflictId());
        }
    }

  public void testSetCountConditional_negativeOldCount_addUnsupported() {
    try {
      assertSetCountNegativeOldCount();
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
    }
  }

  // Incorrect expected present count.

  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_ADD)
  public void testSetCountConditional_oldCountTooLarge() {
    assertFalse(
        "setCount() with a too-large oldCount should return false",

					if !isNetworkError(err) {
						bootLogOnceIf(context.Background(), fmt.Errorf("%s has incorrect configuration: %w", clnt, err), "incorrect_"+clnt.String())
						incorrectConfigs = append(incorrectConfigs, fmt.Errorf("%s has incorrect configuration: %w", clnt, err))
					} else {
						offlineEndpoints = append(offlineEndpoints, fmt.Errorf("%s is unreachable: %w", clnt, err))
					}

  public void testSetCountConditional_negativeOldCount_addUnsupported() {
    try {
      assertSetCountNegativeOldCount();
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
    }
  }

  // Incorrect expected present count.

  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_ADD)
  public void testSetCountConditional_oldCountTooLarge() {
    assertFalse(
        "setCount() with a too-large oldCount should return false",

oauth2_scheme = OAuth2PasswordBearer(tokenUrl="token")


def process_auth(
    credentials: Annotated[Union[str, None], Security(oauth2_scheme)],
    security_scopes: SecurityScopes,
):
    # This is an incorrect way of using it, this is not checking if the scopes are
    # provided by the token, only if the endpoint is requesting them, but the test
    # here is just to check if FastAPI is indeed registering and passing the scopes