// There is no contract one way or another as long as isSubtypeOf() works as expected.
          combined.addAll(asList(typeParam.getBounds()));
          if (combined.size() > 1) { // Object is implicit and only useful if it's the only bound.
            combined.remove(Object.class);
          }
          return super.captureAsTypeVariable(combined.toArray(new Type[0]));
        }
      };
    }

  }

  /**
   * Generates test cases for the given combination of scenario and timeouts. For methods that take
   * an explicit timeout value, all of the given timeoutsToUse result in individual test cases. For
   * methods that do not take an explicit timeout value, a single test case is generated only if the
   * implicit timeout of that method matches the given timeoutsToUse. For example, enter() is

    }

    /**
     * Test script without explicit return (implicit return)
     */
    @Test
    public void test_evaluate_implicitReturn() {
        final Map<String, Object> params = new HashMap<>();
        params.put("x", 5);
        // In Groovy, the last expression is implicitly returned
        assertEquals(10, groovyEngine.evaluate("x * 2", params));
    }

    // NOTE: if timeout < 0, remainingNanos will be < 0 and we will fall into the while(true) loop
    // at the bottom and throw a timeoutexception.
    long timeoutNanos = unit.toNanos(timeout); // we rely on the implicit null check on unit.
    long remainingNanos = timeoutNanos;
    if (Thread.interrupted()) {
      throw new InterruptedException();
    }
    @RetainedLocalRef Object localValue = valueField;

 *     .maximumSize(1000)
 *     .create();
 * }
 *
 * <p>As a {@link Queue} it functions exactly as a {@link PriorityQueue}: its head element -- the
 * implicit target of the methods {@link #peek()}, {@link #poll()} and {@link #remove()} -- is
 * defined as the <i>least</i> element in the queue according to the queue's comparator. But unlike

   *     Object#equals(Object)}) are present among the method arguments
   */
  // TODO(kevinb): provide replacement
  public static <T> Ordering<T> explicit(T leastValue, T... remainingValuesInOrder) {
    return explicit(Lists.asList(leastValue, remainingValuesInOrder));
  }

  // Ordering<Object> singletons

  /**

 *     .maximumSize(1000)
 *     .create();
 * }
 *
 * <p>As a {@link Queue} it functions exactly as a {@link PriorityQueue}: its head element -- the
 * implicit target of the methods {@link #peek()}, {@link #poll()} and {@link #remove()} -- is
 * defined as the <i>least</i> element in the queue according to the queue's comparator. But unlike

</p>

<p>
<b>Requirement 2</b>:
For a given program execution, the mapping <i>W</i>, when limited to synchronizing operations,
must be explainable by some implicit total order of the synchronizing operations
that is consistent with sequencing and the values read and written by those operations.
</p>

<p>

   *     Object#equals(Object)}) are present among the method arguments
   */
  // TODO(kevinb): provide replacement
  public static <T> Ordering<T> explicit(T leastValue, T... remainingValuesInOrder) {
    return explicit(Lists.asList(leastValue, remainingValuesInOrder));
  }

  // Ordering<Object> singletons

  /**

* `oauth2`: усі способи обробки безпеки за допомогою OAuth2 (так звані «потоки»).
    * Декілька з цих потоків підходять для створення провайдера автентифікації OAuth 2.0 (наприклад, Google, Facebook, X (Twitter), GitHub тощо):
        * `implicit`
        * `clientCredentials`
        * `authorizationCode`
    * Але є один окремий «потік», який можна ідеально використати для обробки автентифікації напряму в цьому ж застосунку: