}

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should have correct dialect codes for SMB2+ versions")
    void testDialectCodes() {
        // SMB1 should throw UnsupportedOperationException
        assertThrows(UnsupportedOperationException.class, () -> {
            DialectVersion.SMB1.getDialect();
        });

        // SMB2+ versions should have valid dialect codes
        assertTrue(DialectVersion.SMB202.getDialect() > 0);

        assertTrue(region.hasAccess(RdmaAccess.LOCAL_READ), "Should have local read access");
        assertTrue(region.hasAccess(RdmaAccess.LOCAL_WRITE), "Should have local write access");
        assertFalse(region.hasAccess(RdmaAccess.REMOTE_READ), "Should not have remote read access");

        // Test cleanup
        region.close();

///

## Another module with `APIRouter` { #another-module-with-apirouter }

Let's say you also have the endpoints dedicated to handling "items" from your application in the module at `app/routers/items.py`.

You have *path operations* for:

* `/items/`
* `/items/{item_id}`

It's all the same structure as with `app/routers/users.py`.

# Extra Models { #extra-models }

Continuing with the previous example, it will be common to have more than one related model.

This is especially the case for user models, because:

* The **input model** needs to be able to have a password.
* The **output model** should not have a password.
* The **database model** would probably need to have a hashed password.

/// danger

//   "format": "XXXXX",
//   "XXXXX": {
//
//   }
// }
// Here "XXXXX" depends on the backend, currently we have "fs" and "xl" implementations.
// formatMetaV1 should be inherited by backend format structs. Please look at format-fs.go
// and format-xl.go for details.

// Ideally we will never have a situation where we will have to change the
// fields of this struct and deal with related migration.
type formatMetaV1 struct {

Notice that the default value is still `None`, so the parameter is still optional.

But now, having `Query(max_length=50)` inside of `Annotated`, we are telling FastAPI that we want it to have **additional validation** for this value, we want it to have maximum 50 characters. 😎

/// tip

	}

	for _, count := range vidMap {
		// do we have enough common versions
		// that have enough quorum to satisfy
		// the etag.
		if count >= quorum {
			return etags
		}
	}

	return make([]string, len(partsMetadata))
}

// Extracts list of times from FileInfo slice and returns, skips
// slice elements which have errors.

Let's say you have a file structure as described in [Bigger Applications](bigger-applications.md){.internal-link target=_blank}:

```
.
├── app
│   ├── __init__.py
│   └── main.py
```

In the file `main.py` you have your **FastAPI** app:


{* ../../docs_src/app_testing/main.py *}

### Testing file { #testing-file }

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial008_an_py39.py hl[18:19,26:27] *}

The same way, you could have some dependencies with `yield` and some other dependencies with `return`, and have some of those depend on some of the others.

And you could have a single dependency that requires several other dependencies with `yield`, etc.

You can have any combinations of dependencies that you want.

  /*
   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (Perhaps it should also have required that its cause was a RuntimeException. However, that