<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

        List<Profile> active = selector.getActiveProfiles(profiles, context, problems);
        assertTrue(
                active.isEmpty(), "Expected collection to be empty but had " + active.size() + " elements: " + active);
        assertEquals(1, problems.getErrors().size());
        assertEquals(
                "Failed to determine activation for profile one: BOOM",

                    .collect(joining(", "));
            String message = String.format(
                    "Expected ProjectBuildingResult to have location <%s> but had locations <%s>",
                    formatLocation(columnNumber, lineNumber), actualLocations);
            assertTrue(false, message);
        }

        return this;
    }

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

   * unless the value is {@code null}.
   *
   * <p>Any existing entry spanning either range boundary may be split at the boundary, even if the
   * merge does not affect its value. For example, if {@code rangeMap} had one entry {@code [1, 5]
   * => 3} then {@code rangeMap.merge(Range.closed(0,2), 3, Math::max)} could yield a map with the
   * entries {@code [0, 1) => 3, [1, 2] => 3, (2, 5] => 3}.
   *
   * @since 28.1
   */

You send it a token and it returns an authenticated user.

This provider might be charging you per request, and calling it might take some extra time than if you had a fixed mock user for tests.

You probably want to test the external provider once, but not necessarily call it for every test that runs.

  }

  /**
   * Asserts that a prior call that had caused this thread to block or wait has since returned
   * normally.
   */
  public void assertPriorCallReturns(@Nullable String methodName) throws Exception {
    assertEquals(null, getResponse(methodName).getResult());
  }

  /**
   * Asserts that a prior call that had caused this thread to block or wait has since returned the

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class AbstractListTester<E extends @Nullable Object> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {
  /*
   * Previously we had a field named list that was initialized to the value of
   * collection in setUp(), but that caused problems when a tester changed the
   * value of list or collection but not both.
   */
  protected final List<E> getList() {

Next, it 🤖 takes the first task to finish (let's say, our "slow-file" 📝) and continues whatever it had to do with it.

/// warning

You most probably don't need these technical details.

These details are useful mainly if you had a FastAPI application older than 0.121.0 and you are facing issues with dependencies with `yield`.

///