* it easy to get sample values to use in such tests.
 *
 * This class is pretty fast and loose with default values: it attempts to provide values that are
 * well-formed, but doesn't guarantee values are internally consistent. Callers must take care to
 * configure the factory when sample values impact the correctness of the test.
 */
class TestValueFactory : Closeable {
  var taskFaker: TaskFaker = TaskFaker()

	if ns.SingularTable {
		return ns.TablePrefix + ns.toDBName(str)
	}
	return ns.TablePrefix + inflection.Plural(ns.toDBName(str))
}

// SchemaName generate schema name from table name, don't guarantee it is the reverse value of TableName
func (ns NamingStrategy) SchemaName(table string) string {
	table = strings.TrimPrefix(table, ns.TablePrefix)

	if ns.SingularTable {
		return ns.toSchemaName(table)
	}

 * evaluation and signaling of conditions. Signaling is entirely <a
 * href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monitor_(synchronization)#Implicit_signaling">implicit</a>. By
 * eliminating explicit signaling, this class can guarantee that only one thread is awakened when a
 * condition becomes true (no "signaling storms" due to use of {@link
 * java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition#signalAll Condition.signalAll}) and that no signals are lost

   *
   * This class isn't an arbitrary ForwardingImmutableSet because we need to
   * know that calling {@code clone()} during deserialization will return an
   * object that no one else has a reference to, allowing us to guarantee
   * immutability. Hence, we support only {@link EnumSet}.
   */
  private final transient EnumSet<E> delegate;

  private ImmutableEnumSet(EnumSet<E> delegate) {
    this.delegate = delegate;
  }

    assertTrue(Thread.holdsLock(mutex));
    return super.isEmpty();
  }

  /*
   * We don't assert that the lock is held during calls to iterator(), stream(), and spliterator:
   * `Synchronized` doesn't guarantee that it will hold the mutex for those calls because callers
   * are responsible for taking the mutex themselves:

    assertTrue(Thread.holdsLock(mutex));
    return super.isEmpty();
  }

  /*
   * We don't assert that the lock is held during calls to iterator(), stream(), and spliterator:
   * `Synchronized` doesn't guarantee that it will hold the mutex for those calls because callers
   * are responsible for taking the mutex themselves:

 * package, whether it is a subtype of {@code ImmutableCollection} or not.
 *
 * <h4>Guarantees</h4>
 *
 * <p>Each makes the following guarantees:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li><b>Shallow immutability.</b> Elements can never be added, removed or replaced in this
 *       collection. This is a stronger guarantee than that of {@link
 *       Collections#unmodifiableCollection}, whose contents change whenever the wrapped collection

      PlatformVersion.majorVersion > 11 -> {
        assertThat(s.enabledProtocols.toList()).containsExactly(
          "TLSv1.3",
          "TLSv1.2",
        )
      }

      // Not much we can guarantee on JDK 11.
      PlatformVersion.majorVersion == 11 -> {
        assertThat(s.enabledProtocols.toList()).contains(
          "TLSv1.2",
        )
      }

      // JDK 8 291 removed older versions

 * this structure is never mutated, it provides a thread-safe view of the backing map.
 *
 * <p>The {@link MapIteratorCache} assumes ownership of the backing map, and cannot guarantee
 * correctness in the face of external mutations to the backing map. As such, it is <b>strongly</b>
 * recommended that the caller does not persist a reference to the backing map (unless the backing
 * map is immutable).
 *

    // that simply loops through the subscribers and dispatches the event to each would actually
    // probably provide a stronger order guarantee, though that order would obviously be different
    // in some cases.

    /** Global event queue. */
    private final ConcurrentLinkedQueue<EventWithSubscriber> queue = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<>();