*
   * <p>The type specification is {@code <E extends Comparable>}, instead of the more specific
   * {@code <E extends Comparable<? super E>>}, to support classes defined without generics.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/989
  public static <E extends Comparable> TreeMultiset<E> create() {
    return new TreeMultiset<>(Ordering.natural());
  }

  /**

   * {@code [1]} and {@code [1, 1]}).
   */
  // Note: 90% of the time we don't add type parameters or wildcards that serve only to "tweak" the
  // desired return type. However, *nested* generics introduce a special class of problems that we
  // think tip it over into being worthwhile.
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, S extends T> Comparator<Iterable<S>> lexicographical(
      Comparator<T> comparator) {

   * <p><b>Note:</b> this method is now unnecessary and should be treated as deprecated. Instead,
   * use the {@code HashMap} constructor directly, taking advantage of <a
   * href="https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/generics/genTypeInference.html#type-inference-instantiation">"diamond"
   * syntax</a>.
   *
   * @return a new, empty {@code HashMap}
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("NonApiType") // acts as a direct substitute for a constructor call

   * {@code [1]} and {@code [1, 1]}).
   */
  // Note: 90% of the time we don't add type parameters or wildcards that serve only to "tweak" the
  // desired return type. However, *nested* generics introduce a special class of problems that we
  // think tip it over into being worthwhile.
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, S extends T> Comparator<Iterable<S>> lexicographical(
      Comparator<T> comparator) {

 * used; or if the class exposes a public parameter-less constructor then it will be "new"d and
 * returned.
 *
 * <p>All default instances returned by {@link #get} are generics-safe. Clients won't get type
 * errors for using {@code get(Comparator.class)} as a {@code Comparator<Foo>}, for example.
 * Immutable empty instances are returned for collection types; {@code ""} for string; {@code 0} for

        checkNotNull(entry.getValue());
      }
      @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
      // immutable collections are safe for covariant casts
      // and getting the generics right for EnumMap is difficult to impossible
      ImmutableMap<K, V> result = ImmutableEnumMap.asImmutable(new EnumMap(enumMap));
      return result;
    }

    int size = map.size();
    switch (size) {

```python
from typing import Any


def some_function(data: Any):
    print(data)
```

### 泛型（Generic types） { #generic-types }

有些型別可以在方括號中接收「型別參數」，以定義其內部元素的型別，例如「字串的 list」可以宣告為 `list[str]`。

這些能接收型別參數的型別稱為「泛型（Generic types）」或「Generics」。

你可以將相同的內建型別用作泛型（使用方括號並在裡面放型別）：

* `list`
* `tuple`
* `set`
* `dict`

#### List { #list }

 * used; or if the class exposes a public parameter-less constructor then it will be "new"d and
 * returned.
 *
 * <p>All default instances returned by {@link #get} are generics-safe. Clients won't get type
 * errors for using {@code get(Comparator.class)} as a {@code Comparator<Foo>}, for example.
 * Immutable empty instances are returned for collection types; {@code ""} for string; {@code 0} for

> be automatically configured to add the correct license header to new source
> files based on the source location.

### Type-checking, generics and casting

You should try to write code that does not require suppressing any warnings from
the compiler, e.g. suppressing type-checking, raw generics, and so on. However,
this isn't always possible or practical. In such cases, you should use the

```python
from typing import Any


def some_function(data: Any):
    print(data)
```

### 泛型类型 { #generic-types }

有些类型可以在方括号中接收“类型参数”（type parameters），用于声明其内部值的类型。比如“字符串列表”可以写为 `list[str]`。

这些能接收类型参数的类型称为“泛型类型”（Generic types）或“泛型”（Generics）。

你可以把相同的内建类型作为泛型使用（带方括号和内部类型）：

* `list`
* `tuple`
* `set`
* `dict`

#### 列表 { #list }