imported normally and vendored by the standard library.

Vendored packages are internally renamed with a "vendor/" prefix
to preserve the invariant that all packages have distinct paths.
This is necessary to avoid compiler and linker conflicts. Adding
a "vendor/" prefix also maintains the invariant that standard
library packages begin with a dotless path element.

The module requirements of std and cmd do not influence version

                    true, // --all
                    false, // --infer (conflicts with --all)
                    false, // --fix-model (conflicts with --all)
                    false, // --plugins (conflicts with --all)
                    "4.0.0" // --model (conflicts with --all)
                    ));

            // --all should take precedence and make strategy applicable

                  <div class="well">
                      Merging `release` back to `master` is a regular operation you’re free to do, at any time. Usually, you will see conflicts in `notes.md` or `accepted-public-api-changes.json`.
                      On `master` branch, these two files are usually reset (cleaned up), unless you have special reasons not to do so.
                  </div>

 * multi-level dependency graph to a map of ordered lists that can be turned into classpaths.
 * During this process only the most relevant version of each artifact
 * (based on group ID and artifact ID) is retained, resolving conflicts and eliminating duplicates to ensure
 * that each dependency is included only once in the final build.</p>
 *
 * <p><dfn>Dependency resolution</dfn> is the process of collecting dependencies, flattening the result graph,

*   Clone the TensorFlow repository and switch to the appropriate branch for
    your desired version—for example, `r2.8` for version 2.8.
*   Apply the desired changes (i.e., cherry-pick them) and resolve any code
    conflicts.
*   Run TensorFlow tests and ensure they pass.
*   [Build](https://www.tensorflow.org/install/source) the TensorFlow pip
    package from source.

## Continuous build status

    lock03 = factory3.newReentrantLock(OtherOrder.THIRD);
  }

  // In the unittest, create each ordered factory with its own set of lock
  // graph nodes (as opposed to using the static per-Enum map) to avoid
  // conflicts across different test runs.
  private <E extends Enum<E>>
      CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E> newInstanceWithExplicitOrdering(
          Class<E> enumClass, Policy policy) {

            }
        }
        if (gasLocations.values().stream().anyMatch(l -> l.size() > 1)) {
            throw new IllegalStateException("Extension conflicts in file " + extensionFile + ": "
                    + gasLocations.entrySet().stream()
                            .map(e -> e.getKey() + " defined on lines "
                                    + e.getValue().stream()

  <mime-type type="application/x-font-framemaker"/>
  <mime-type type="application/x-font-ghostscript">
    <!-- conflict with portable sound format -->
    <glob pattern="*.gsf"/>
  </mime-type>
  <mime-type type="application/x-font-libgrx"/>
  <mime-type type="application/x-font-linux-psf">
    <!-- conflict with portable sound format -->
    <glob pattern="*.psf"/>
  </mime-type>

Of course, there are some cases where there's no problem in running the previous steps multiple times, in that case, it's a lot easier to handle.

/// tip

   *       using this method. For example, {@code not(in(target))} is generally more readable than
   *       {@code not(target::contains)}.
   *   <li>This method's name conflicts with Kotlin's {@code in} operator.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p><b>Discouraged:</b> Prefer using either {@code target::contains} or {@code x ->