*
 * // In case bug 12345 happens again we'd rather just die
 * Verify.verify(bill.status() == Status.UNPAID,
 *     "Unexpected bill status: %s", bill.status());
 * }
 *
 * <h3>Comparison to alternatives</h3>
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> In some cases the differences explained below can be subtle. When it's unclear
 * which approach to use, <b>don't worry</b> too much about it; just pick something that seems

      if (array[i] == target) {
        return i;
      }
    }
    return -1;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the least value present in {@code array}, using the same rules of comparison as {@link
   * Math#min(double, double)}.
   *
   * @param array a <i>nonempty</i> array of {@code double} values
   * @return the value present in {@code array} that is less than or equal to every other value in

  }

  /**
   * Returns the stack trace of {@code throwable}, possibly providing slower iteration over the full
   * trace but faster iteration over parts of the trace. Here, "slower" and "faster" are defined in
   * comparison to the normal way to access the stack trace, {@link Throwable#getStackTrace()
   * throwable.getStackTrace()}. Note, however, that this method's special implementation is not

			t.Errorf("Test %d: Expected the result to `%v`, but instead got `%v`", i+1, testCase.expectedResult, actualResult)
		}
	}
}

// TestIsValidRegion - Tests validate the comparison logic for asserting whether the region from http request is valid.
func TestIsValidRegion(t *testing.T) {
	testCases := []struct {
		inputReqRegion  string
		inputConfRegion string

		expectedResult bool
	}{

         *
         * - Under Android, it does.
         *
         * We want users to see the same behavior when they compare a built-in TypeVariable against
         * ours as they do when they perform the same comparison in reverse. To provide that
         * behavior on all platforms, TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable
         * implementation in each of the three possible cases:
         *

   * left.equals(right)} instead of this method.
   *
   * @param left the map to treat as the "left" map for purposes of comparison
   * @param right the map to treat as the "right" map for purposes of comparison
   * @return the difference between the two maps
   */
  public static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      MapDifference<K, V> difference(

   * left.equals(right)} instead of this method.
   *
   * @param left the map to treat as the "left" map for purposes of comparison
   * @param right the map to treat as the "right" map for purposes of comparison
   * @return the difference between the two maps
   */
  public static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      MapDifference<K, V> difference(

 * detailed at {@link ImmutableCollection}.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> as with any sorted collection, you are strongly advised not to use a {@link
 * Comparator} or {@link Comparable} type whose comparison behavior is <i>inconsistent with
 * equals</i>. That is, {@code a.compareTo(b)} or {@code comparator.compare(a, b)} should equal zero
 * <i>if and only if</i> {@code a.equals(b)}. If this advice is not followed, the resulting

import javax.crypto.spec.SecretKeySpec;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Static methods to obtain {@link HashFunction} instances, and other static hashing-related
 * utilities.
 *
 * <p>A comparison of the various hash functions can be found <a
 * href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_q2EVcxA2HjcrlVMbaqXwMj31h9M5-Bqj_m8vITOwwk/">here</a>.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Dimitris Andreou

  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects
  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter
  //   is). If we wanted to be strict about it, we could store the unpark() time in the Waiter node