import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Random;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;

/** A benchmark comparing the various striped implementations. */
@VmOptions({"-Xms12g", "-Xmx12g", "-d64"})
public class StripedBenchmark {
  private static final Supplier<Lock> LOCK_SUPPLIER =
      new Supplier<Lock>() {
        @Override

import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Iterator;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A utility for testing an Iterator implementation by comparing its behavior to that of a "known
 * good" reference implementation. In order to accomplish this, it's important to test a great
 * variety of sequences of the {@link Iterator#next}, {@link Iterator#hasNext} and {@link

   * instead of {@code Comparator<? super T>}.
   */
  public void testMinMaxWithSupertypeComparator() {
    Comparator<Number> numberComparator =
        // Can't use Comparator.comparing(Number::intValue) due to Java 7 compatibility.
        new Comparator<Number>() {
          @Override
          public int compare(Number a, Number b) {
            return a.intValue() - b.intValue();
          }

        return lifecyclesMap.values().stream()
                .peek(l -> Objects.requireNonNull(l.getId(), "A lifecycle must have an id."))
                .sorted(Comparator.comparing(Lifecycle::getId, comparator))
                .collect(Collectors.toList());
    }

    private Map<String, Lifecycle> lookupLifecycles() {
        // TODO: Remove the following code when maven-compat is gone

import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Iterator;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A utility for testing an Iterator implementation by comparing its behavior to that of a "known
 * good" reference implementation. In order to accomplish this, it's important to test a great
 * variety of sequences of the {@link Iterator#next}, {@link Iterator#hasNext} and {@link

// These tests should not be confused with `[*]_grad_test` which compare the
// result of `gradient_checker` and `[*]_grad`. The tests here test the
// functionality of `gradient_checker` by comparing the result with expected
// manual user-provided gradients.
class GradientCheckerTest
    : public ::testing::TestWithParam<std::tuple<const char*, bool, bool>> {
 protected:
  void SetUp() override {

import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * {@code ObjectCountLinkedHashMap} is a subclass of {@code ObjectCountHashMap} with insertion
 * iteration order, and uses arrays to store key objects and count values. Comparing to using a
 * traditional {@code LinkedHashMap} implementation which stores keys and count values as map
 * entries, {@code ObjectCountLinkedHashMap} minimizes object allocation and reduces memory
 * footprint.
 */

    attributes:
      label: 3. What would that same code look like if we added your feature?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Comparing two approaches to a use case side by side can make it easier to examine the
        differences between them.


        Additionally, it's very useful to us if you can provide a "straw API" — what the

But then the attackers try with username `stanleyjobsox` and password `love123`.

And your application code does something like:

        valueMap.put("action", action.replace('\t', '_').toUpperCase(Locale.ENGLISH));
        valueMap.put("user", user.map(FessUserBean::getUserId).orElse("-"));
        final Comparator<Map.Entry<String, String>> c = Comparator.comparing(Map.Entry::getKey);
        params.entrySet().stream().sorted(c).forEach(e -> {
            valueMap.put(e.getKey(), e.getValue().replace('\t', '_'));
        });
        log(valueMap);
    }