verify(transport).isSigningOptional();
        verify(transport).isSigningEnforced();
    }

    // Error propagation: signing checks may throw SmbException
    @Test
    @DisplayName("signing checks propagate SmbException")
    void signingChecks_throw() throws Exception {
        doThrow(new SmbException("opt error")).when(transport).isSigningOptional();

    @Override
    public boolean isAvailable() {
        try {
            // Check if DiSNI is available on the classpath
            Class.forName("com.ibm.disni.RdmaActiveEndpointGroup");

            // Additional checks could include:
            // - Verifying RDMA devices are available
            // - Testing basic RDMA operations
            // - Checking for required native libraries

            return true;

	}
	defer conn.Close()

	// Bind to the lookup user account
	if err = l.LDAP.LookupBind(conn); err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

	// Check if the passed in username is a valid DN.
	if !l.ParsesAsDN(username) {
		// We consider it as a login username and attempt to check it exists in
		// the directory.
		bindDN, err := l.LDAP.LookupUsername(conn, username)
		if err != nil {

// SetExpectedMax set expected max data expected from reader
func (r *Reader) SetExpectedMax(expectedMax int64) {
	r.expectedMax = expectedMax
}

// AddChecksum will add checksum checks as specified in
// https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/checking-object-integrity.html
// Returns ErrInvalidChecksum if a problem with the checksum is found.
func (r *Reader) AddChecksum(req *http.Request, ignoreValue bool) error {

## Use the instance as a dependency { #use-the-instance-as-a-dependency }

Then, we could use this `checker` in a `Depends(checker)`, instead of `Depends(FixedContentQueryChecker)`, because the dependency is the instance, `checker`, not the class itself.

And when solving the dependency, **FastAPI** will call this `checker` like:

```Python
checker(q="somequery")
```

		},
		"chk_user_checks_name3": {
			Name:       "chk_user_checks_name3",
			Constraint: "name <> 'jinzhu'",
		},
	}

	checks := user.ParseCheckConstraints()

	for k, result := range results {
		v, ok := checks[k]
		if !ok {
			t.Errorf("Failed to found check %v from parsed checks %+v", k, checks)
		}

		for _, name := range []string{"Name", "Constraint"} {

     * their users.
     *
     * However, the checker *we* use has this special knowledge about `Collection.toArray()` anyway,
     * so in our implementation code, we can rely on that. That's why the expression below
     * type-checks.
     */
    return super.toArray();
  }

    public FactoryMethodReturnValueTester testSerializable() throws Exception {
      for (Invokable<?, ?> factory : getFactoriesToTest()) {
        Object instance = instantiate(factory);
        if (instance != null) {
          try {
            SerializableTester.reserialize(instance);
          } catch (Exception e) { // sneaky checked exception

	return "CONSTRAINT ? CHECK (?)", []interface{}{clause.Column{Name: chk.Name}, clause.Expr{SQL: chk.Constraint}}
}

// ParseCheckConstraints parse schema check constraints
func (schema *Schema) ParseCheckConstraints() map[string]CheckConstraint {
	checks := map[string]CheckConstraint{}
	for _, field := range schema.FieldsByDBName {
		if chk := field.TagSettings["CHECK"]; chk != "" {
			names := strings.Split(chk, ",")

      - name: GitHub CODEOWNERS Validator
        uses: mszostok/codeowners-validator@v0.7.4
        with:
          checks: "files,duppatterns,syntax"
          experimental_checks: "notowned,avoid-shadowing"

      # downgrading to 0.7.2 for owners check to avoid issues with token permissions check,
      # see https://github.com/mszostok/codeowners-validator/issues/224
      - name: GitHub CODEOWNERS Validator