}

  /**
   * This test creates a long random sequence of inputs, then a lot of differently configured sinks
   * process it; all should produce the same answer, the only difference should be the number of
   * process()/processRemaining() invocations, due to alignment.
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible // slow. TODO(cpovirk): Maybe just reduce iterations under Android.

```

In a given setup, there are `n` MinIO instances talking to `m` KES servers but only `1` central KMS. The most simple setup consists of `1` MinIO server or cluster talking to `1` KMS via `1` KES server.

The main difference between various MinIO-KMS deployments is the KMS implementation. The following table helps you select the right option for your use case:

type ServerSystemConfig struct {
	NEndpoints int
	CmdLines   []string
	MinioEnv   map[string]string
	Checksum   string
}

// Diff - returns error on first difference found in two configs.
func (s1 *ServerSystemConfig) Diff(s2 *ServerSystemConfig) error {
	if s1.Checksum != s2.Checksum {
		return fmt.Errorf("Expected MinIO binary checksum: %s, seen: %s", s1.Checksum, s2.Checksum)
	}

func IsARMFloatCmp(op obj.As) bool {
	switch op {
	case arm.ACMPF, arm.ACMPD:
		return true
	}
	return false
}

// ARMMRCOffset implements the peculiar encoding of the MRC and MCR instructions.
// The difference between MRC and MCR is represented by a bit high in the word, not
// in the usual way by the opcode itself. Asm must use AMRC for both instructions, so
// we return the opcode for MRC so that asm doesn't need to import obj/arm.

		}
	}

	// Test for Anonymous/unsigned http request.
	// Bucket policy related functions doesn't support anonymous requests, setting policies shouldn't make a difference.
	bucketPolicyStr := fmt.Sprintf(bucketPolicyTemplate, bucketName, bucketName)
	// create unsigned HTTP request for PutBucketPolicyHandler.
	anonReq, err := newTestRequest(http.MethodPut, getPutPolicyURL("", bucketName),

---

Vous pourriez aussi la définir comme une fonction classique plutôt qu'avec `async def` :

{* ../../docs_src/first_steps/tutorial003.py hl[7] *}

/// note

Si vous ne connaissez pas la différence, allez voir la section [Concurrence : *"Vous êtes pressés ?"*](../async.md#vous-etes-presses){.internal-link target=_blank}.

///

### Étape 5 : retourner le contenu

![Interceptors Diagram](../assets/images/******@****.***)

### Application Interceptors

Interceptors are registered as either _application_ or _network_ interceptors. We'll use the `LoggingInterceptor` defined above to show the difference.

Register an _application_ interceptor by calling `addInterceptor()` on `OkHttpClient.Builder`:

```java
OkHttpClient client = new OkHttpClient.Builder()
    .addInterceptor(new LoggingInterceptor())
    .build();

          .put(Ordering.class, AlwaysEqual.INSTANCE)
          .put(Range.class, Range.all())
          .put(MapDifference.class, Maps.difference(ImmutableMap.of(), ImmutableMap.of()))
          .put(
              SortedMapDifference.class,
              Maps.difference(ImmutableSortedMap.of(), ImmutableSortedMap.of()))
          // reflect
          .put(AnnotatedElement.class, Object.class)

À ne pas confondre avec la déclaration de valeurs par défaut comme ici :

```Python
    first_name="john", last_name="doe"
```

C'est une chose différente.

On utilise un deux-points (`:`), et pas un égal (`=`).

Et ajouter des annotations de types ne crée normalement pas de différence avec le comportement qui aurait eu lieu si elles n'étaient pas là.

        data[7] = (byte) (high >> 24);

        PacDataInputStream pdis = createInputStream(data);
        Date date = pdis.readFiletime();
        assertNotNull(date);
        // Allow for a small difference due to precision loss
        assertEquals(time / 1000, date.getTime() / 1000);

        // Test with null date (0x7fffffff ffffffff)