これがその歴史のほんの一部です。

## 代替手段

数年前から、私は複雑な要件を持つAPI (機械学習、分散システム、非同期ジョブ、NoSQLデータベースなど) を作成しており、いくつかの開発者チームを率いています。

その一環で、多くの方法を調査し、テストし、利用する必要がありました。

**FastAPI** の歴史は、その前身の歴史が大部分を占めています。

[代替ツールから受けたインスピレーションと比較](alternatives.md){.internal-link target=_blank}のセクションでこう述べています:

<blockquote markdown="1">

**FastAPI**は、代替ツールのこれまでの働きがなければ存在しなかったでしょう。

以前に作られた多くのツールが、作成における刺激として役立ってきました。

   * There is no need for a blocking lock; when the lock is not
   * available, threads try other slots (or the base).  During these
   * retries, there is increased contention and reduced locality,
   * which is still better than alternatives.
   *
   * Per-thread hash codes are initialized to random values.
   * Contention and/or table collisions are indicated by failed
   * CASes when performing an update operation (see method

   * There is no need for a blocking lock; when the lock is not
   * available, threads try other slots (or the base).  During these
   * retries, there is increased contention and reduced locality,
   * which is still better than alternatives.
   *
   * Per-thread hash codes are initialized to random values.
   * Contention and/or table collisions are indicated by failed
   * CASes when performing an update operation (see method

   * There is no need for a blocking lock; when the lock is not
   * available, threads try other slots (or the base).  During these
   * retries, there is increased contention and reduced locality,
   * which is still better than alternatives.
   *
   * Per-thread hash codes are initialized to random values.
   * Contention and/or table collisions are indicated by failed
   * CASes when performing an update operation (see method

 *   <li>It doesn't offer much monitoring.
 *   <li>It doesn't propagate exceptions, so apps don't have a way to react to them.
 *   <li>It doesn't interoperate well with RxJava, coroutines, and other more commonly used
 *       alternatives.
 *   <li>It imposes requirements on the lifecycle of its subscribers. For example, if an event
 *       occurs between when one subscriber is removed and the next subscriber is added, the event
 *       is dropped.

  - reference/testclient.md
- fastapi-people.md
- Resources:
  - resources/index.md
  - project-generation.md
  - external-links.md
  - newsletter.md
- About:
  - about/index.md
  - alternatives.md
  - history-design-future.md
  - benchmarks.md
- Help:
  - help/index.md
  - help-fastapi.md
  - contributing.md
- release-notes.md
markdown_extensions:
  toc:
    permalink: true

There are several alternatives, including:

* <a href="https://www.uvicorn.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Uvicorn</a>: a high performance ASGI server.

    Feel free to skip this.

    Peewee is not recommended with FastAPI as it doesn't play well with anything async Python. There are several better alternatives.

!!! info
    These docs assume Pydantic v1.

    Because Pewee doesn't play well with anything async and there are better alternatives, I won't update these docs for Pydantic v2, they are kept for now only for historical purposes.

 *
 * // In case bug 12345 happens again we'd rather just die
 * Verify.verify(bill.status() == Status.UNPAID,
 *     "Unexpected bill status: %s", bill.status());
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h3>Comparison to alternatives</h3>
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> In some cases the differences explained below can be subtle. When it's unclear
 * which approach to use, <b>don't worry</b> too much about it; just pick something that seems

 *
 * // In case bug 12345 happens again we'd rather just die
 * Verify.verify(bill.status() == Status.UNPAID,
 *     "Unexpected bill status: %s", bill.status());
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h3>Comparison to alternatives</h3>
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> In some cases the differences explained below can be subtle. When it's unclear
 * which approach to use, <b>don't worry</b> too much about it; just pick something that seems