// Clear execution order before test
        PriorityTrackingBooster.clearExecutionOrder();

        scoreUpdater.execute();

        // Should be executed in order: 1, 0, -1
        List<Integer> executionOrder = PriorityTrackingBooster.getExecutionOrder();
        assertEquals(3, executionOrder.size());
        assertEquals(Integer.valueOf(1), executionOrder.get(0));

    RateLimiter unused;
    unused = RateLimiter.create(1.0, 1, NANOSECONDS);
    unused = RateLimiter.create(1.0, 0, NANOSECONDS);

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> RateLimiter.create(0.0, 1, NANOSECONDS));

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> RateLimiter.create(1.0, -1, NANOSECONDS));
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // difference in String.format rounding?

    RateLimiter unused;
    unused = RateLimiter.create(1.0, 1, NANOSECONDS);
    unused = RateLimiter.create(1.0, 0, NANOSECONDS);

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> RateLimiter.create(0.0, 1, NANOSECONDS));

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> RateLimiter.create(1.0, -1, NANOSECONDS));
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // difference in String.format rounding?

//
// Case 1: Not present -> represented by a nil RangeSpec
// Case 2: bytes=1-10 (absolute start and end offsets) -> RangeSpec{false, 1, 10}
// Case 3: bytes=10- (absolute start offset with end offset unspecified) -> RangeSpec{false, 10, -1}
// Case 4: bytes=-30 (suffix length specification) -> RangeSpec{true, -30, -1}
type HTTPRangeSpec struct {
	// Does the range spec refer to a suffix of the object?
	IsSuffixLength bool

    assertThat(input).isEqualTo(expectedOutput);
  }

  public void testReverseIndexed() {
    testReverse(new double[] {}, 0, 0, new double[] {});
    testReverse(new double[] {1}, 0, 1, new double[] {1});
    testReverse(new double[] {1, 2}, 0, 2, new double[] {2, 1});
    testReverse(new double[] {3, 1, 1}, 0, 2, new double[] {1, 3, 1});
    testReverse(new double[] {3, 1, 1}, 0, 1, new double[] {3, 1, 1});

    assertThat(input).isEqualTo(expectedOutput);
  }

  public void testReverseIndexed() {
    testReverse(new long[] {}, 0, 0, new long[] {});
    testReverse(new long[] {1}, 0, 1, new long[] {1});
    testReverse(new long[] {1, 2}, 0, 2, new long[] {2, 1});
    testReverse(new long[] {3, 1, 1}, 0, 2, new long[] {1, 3, 1});
    testReverse(new long[] {3, 1, 1}, 0, 1, new long[] {3, 1, 1});

    assertThat(input).isEqualTo(expectedOutput);
  }

  public void testReverseIndexed() {
    testReverse(new short[] {}, 0, 0, new short[] {});
    testReverse(new short[] {1}, 0, 1, new short[] {1});
    testReverse(new short[] {1, 2}, 0, 2, new short[] {2, 1});
    testReverse(new short[] {3, 1, 1}, 0, 2, new short[] {1, 3, 1});
    testReverse(new short[] {3, 1, 1}, 0, 1, new short[] {3, 1, 1});

 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *
 * (We could consider releasing a listenablefuture:1.0.1 someday. But we would want to look into how
 * that affects users, especially users of the Android Gradle Plugin, since the plugin developers
 * put in a special hack for us: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/131431257)
 */

    @Test
    void testShareInfoCtr502DecodeWithInvalidArraySize() throws NdrException {
        srvsvc.ShareInfoCtr502 ctr502 = new srvsvc.ShareInfoCtr502();

        when(mockNdrBuffer.dec_ndr_long()).thenReturn(10, 1); // count, array pointer
        when(mockDeferredBuffer.dec_ndr_long()).thenReturn(0x10000); // invalid array size

        assertThrows(NdrException.class, () -> ctr502.decode(mockNdrBuffer));
    }

    @Test

		}

		// release data to pool
		field.NewValuePool.Put(values[idx])
	}
}

// ScanMode scan data mode
type ScanMode uint8

// scan modes
const (
	ScanInitialized         ScanMode = 1 << 0 // 1
	ScanUpdate              ScanMode = 1 << 1 // 2
	ScanOnConflictDoNothing ScanMode = 1 << 2 // 4
)

// Scan scan rows into db statement
func Scan(rows Rows, db *DB, mode ScanMode) {
	var (