return null;
        }
      }
      return null;
    }

    @Override
    Iterator<Entry<Cut<C>, Range<C>>> entryIterator() {
      /*
       * We want to start the iteration at the first range where the upper bound is in
       * upperBoundWindow.
       */
      Iterator<Range<C>> backingItr;
      if (!upperBoundWindow.hasLowerBound()) {

* <a href="https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-ui" class="external-link" target="_blank"><strong>Swagger UI</strong></a>で、インタラクティブな探索をしながら、ブラウザから直接APIを呼び出してテストが行えます。

![Swagger UI interaction](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/index/index-03-swagger-02.png)

* <a href="https://github.com/Rebilly/ReDoc" class="external-link" target="_blank"><strong>ReDoc</strong></a>を使用したもう一つのAPIドキュメント生成。

Tenía un sistema de inyección de dependencias. Requería pre-registrar componentes, como otras herramientas discutidas anteriormente. Pero aún así, era una gran funcionalidad.

Nunca pude usarlo en un proyecto completo, ya que no tenía integración de seguridad, por lo que no podía reemplazar todas las funcionalidades que tenía con los generadores de full-stack basados en Flask-apispec. Tenía en mi lista de tareas pendientes de proyectos crear un pull request agregando esa funcionalidad.

   * `ConcurrentModificationException`, but if new responses are added while iterating, their URLs
   * will not be returned. If existing responses are evicted during iteration, they will be absent
   * (unless they were already returned).
   *
   * The iterator supports [MutableIterator.remove]. Removing a URL from the iterator evicts the

Then you go to the counter 🔀, to the initial task that is now finished ⏯, pick the burgers, say thanks and take them to the table. That finishes that step / task of interaction with the counter ⏹. That in turn, creates a new task, of "eating burgers" 🔀 ⏯, but the previous one of "getting burgers" is finished ⏹.

### Parallel Burgers { #parallel-burgers }

  }

  /**
   * This test really pushes the boundaries of what we support. In general the splitter's behaviour
   * is not well defined if the char sequence it's splitting is mutated during iteration.
   */
  private void assertSplitterIterableIsLazy(Splitter splitter) {
    StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
    Iterator<String> iterator = splitter.split(builder).iterator();

 * a {@code Map<R, Map<C, V>>}. A method call like {@code column(columnKey).get(rowKey)} still runs
 * quickly, since the row key is provided. However, {@code column(columnKey).size()} takes longer,
 * since an iteration across all row keys occurs.
 *
 * <p>Note that this implementation is not synchronized. If multiple threads access this table
 * concurrently and one of the threads modifies the table, it must be synchronized externally.
 *

Je n'ai jamais pu l'utiliser dans un projet complet, car il n'avait pas d'intégration de sécurité, et je ne pouvais donc pas remplacer toutes les fonctionnalités que j'avais avec les générateurs complets basés sur Flask-apispec. J'avais dans mon backlog de projets de créer une pull request pour ajouter cette fonctionnalité.

    assertIntact(q);
    q.remove(9);
    q.remove(11);
    q.remove(10);
    // Now we're in the critical state: [1, 15, 13, 8, 14]
    // Removing 8 while iterating caused duplicates in iteration result.
    List<Integer> result = Lists.newArrayListWithCapacity(initial.size());
    for (Iterator<Integer> iter = q.iterator(); iter.hasNext(); ) {
      Integer value = iter.next();
      result.add(value);

            byte[] nonce = encryptionContext.generateNonce();
            String nonceHex = bytesToHex(nonce);
            boolean added = nonceSet.add(nonceHex);
            assertTrue(added, "Nonce collision detected at iteration " + i);
        }

        // Then
        assertEquals(count, nonceSet.size(), "All generated nonces should be unique");
    }

    @Test