[some annotation-only dependencies][guava-deps], which we discuss in more
    detail at that link.

4.  Serialized forms of ALL objects are subject to change unless noted
    otherwise. Do not persist these and assume they can be read by a future
    version of the library.

5.  Our classes are not designed to protect against a malicious caller. You
    should not use them for communication between trusted and untrusted code.

            getSubjectGenerator()
                .getSampleElements(getSubjectGenerator().getCollectionSize().getNumElements()));
    sort(entries, Helpers.entryComparator(navigableMap.comparator()));

    // some tests assume SEVERAL == 3
    if (entries.size() >= 1) {
      a = entries.get(0);
      if (entries.size() >= 3) {
        b = entries.get(1);
        c = entries.get(2);
      }
    }
  }

        copyToList(
            getSubjectGenerator()
                .getSampleElements(getSubjectGenerator().getCollectionSize().getNumElements()));
    sort(values, navigableSet.comparator());

    // some tests assume SEVERAL == 3
    if (values.size() >= 1) {
      a = values.get(0);
      if (values.size() >= 3) {
        b = values.get(1);
        c = values.get(2);
      }
    }
  }

        assertTrue(reqCap.getValue() instanceof Smb2ChangeNotifyRequest);
    }

    // call() should delegate to watch() and return the same list
    @Test
    @DisplayName("call() delegates to watch() and returns same result")
    void call_delegatesToWatch() throws Exception {
        List<FileNotifyInformation> info = new ArrayList<>();
        NotifyResponse resp = mock(NotifyResponse.class);

64 sets, which is *16* 64 = 1024* drives in total.

- *If total number of nodes are of odd number then GCD algorithm provides affinity towards odd number erasure sets to provide for uniform distribution across nodes*. This is to ensure that same number of drives are pariticipating in any erasure set. For example if you have 2 nodes with 180 drives then GCD is 15 but this would lead to uneven distribution, one of the nodes would participate more drives. To avoid this the affinity is given towards...

    @Test
    void testGetUserPrincipal() {
        // Act: Call the method under test
        Principal actualPrincipal = ntlmRequest.getUserPrincipal();

        // Assert: Verify that the returned principal is the same as the one provided in the constructor
        assertSame(mockPrincipal, actualPrincipal, "getUserPrincipal should return the principal object.");
    }

    /**

        @Test
        void arraysHaveSameLength() {
            assertEquals(WinError.WINERR_CODES.length, WinError.WINERR_MESSAGES.length,
                    "WINERR_CODES and WINERR_MESSAGES should have the same length");
        }

        @Test
        void messagesAlignWithCodes() {
            for (int i = 0; i < WinError.WINERR_CODES.length; i++) {
                int code = WinError.WINERR_CODES[i];

            // first one is known, so it comes first
            return -1;
        }
        int rv = Integer.compare(i1, i2);
        if (rv != 0) {
            return rv;
        }
        // same execution point, now compare priorities
        return Integer.compare(p1.priority(), p2.priority());
    }

  <artifactId>testvalidpom</artifactId>
  <version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>

  <description>
    This will test if the module validator recognized that this dependency with classifier
    is not the same as the module itself.
  </description>
  <dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.example.group</groupId>
      <artifactId>testvalidpom</artifactId>
      <version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>

  <groupId>com.example.group</groupId>
  <artifactId>testinvalidpom</artifactId>
  <version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>

  <description>
    This will test if the module validator recognized that this
    dependency is the same as the module itself.
  </description>
  <dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.example.group</groupId>
      <artifactId>testinvalidpom</artifactId>
      <version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>