*   <li>Access to the type of the toolchain (e.g., JDK, compiler).</li>
 *   <li>Retrieval of the specific version of the toolchain.</li>
 *   <li>Configuration of toolchain properties to match the project's requirements.</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Example usage:</p>
 * <pre>
 * Toolchain toolchain = ...; // Obtain a Toolchain instance
 * String type = toolchain.getType(); // Get the type of the toolchain

     * @param defaultClazz The default implementation type
     * @return Custom implementation type if one was given; otherwise default implementation type
     */
    private static Class<?> loadImplementation(final String name, final Class<?> defaultClazz) {
        if (null == name) {
            return defaultClazz; // just use the default type
        }

    /**
     * Retrieves every toolchains of given type available in user settings.
     *
     * @param type the type, must not be {@code null}
     * @param context the Maven session, must not be {@code null}
     * @since 3.0 (addition of the <code>MavenSession</code> parameter)
     */
    ToolchainPrivate[] getToolchainsForType(String type, MavenSession context) throws MisconfiguredToolchainException;

    /**

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

{
    "properties": {
      "thumbnail_id": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "path": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "generator": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "target": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "createdTime": {
        "type": "long"
      },
      "createdBy": {
        "type": "keyword"
      }
    }

        // Test the second step (processing Type 2 and creating Type 3 message)
        when(mockAuth.getDomain()).thenReturn(domain);
        when(mockAuth.getUsername()).thenReturn(username);
        when(mockAuth.getPassword()).thenReturn(password);
        NtlmContext context = new NtlmContext(mockAuth, true);

        // State 1: Generate Type 1 message
        context.initSecContext(new byte[0], 0, 0);