.toList();

        private Impl(int maxCountLimit, Predicate<? super P> filter) {
            if (maxCountLimit < 0) {
                throw new IllegalArgumentException("maxCountLimit must be non-negative");
            }
            this.maxCountLimit = maxCountLimit;
            this.totalCount = new AtomicInteger();
            this.counters = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();

   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code limitSize} is negative
   * @since 3.0
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Iterator<T> limit(
      Iterator<T> iterator, int limitSize) {
    checkNotNull(iterator);
    checkArgument(limitSize >= 0, "limit is negative");
    return new Iterator<T>() {
      private int count;

      @Override

   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code limitSize} is negative
   * @since 3.0
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Iterator<T> limit(
      Iterator<T> iterator, int limitSize) {
    checkNotNull(iterator);
    checkArgument(limitSize >= 0, "limit is negative");
    return new Iterator<T>() {
      private int count;

      @Override

    }

    @Test
    public void test_negativeFrequencies() {
        String[] text = { "test" };
        String[][] readings = { { "test" } };

        // Negative frequencies might be allowed (though unusual)
        SuggestItem item = new SuggestItem(text, readings, null, -1L, -1L, 1.0f, null, null, null, SuggestItem.Kind.QUERY);

        assertEquals(-1L, item.getDocFreq());

configuration using e.g. the `mc admin config` commands you will need to adjust
your deployment.

Even though this change is backward compatible we do not expect that it affects
the vast majority of deployments in any negative way.

> Will an upgrade of an existing MinIO cluster impact the SLA of the cluster or will it even cause downtime?

No, an upgrade should not cause any downtime. However, on the first startup -

        assertEquals(0, request.threshold());
    }

    @Test
    public void testThresholdWithNegative() {
        CurlRequest request = new CurlRequest(Method.GET, "https://example.com");

        // Negative threshold should be accepted (though may not make sense)
        request.threshold(-1);

        assertEquals(-1, request.threshold());
    }

    @Test
    public void testThresholdWithLargeValue() {

            assertEquals("share$", result.getShare());
            assertEquals("path", result.getPath());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle negative expiration times")
        void testNegativeExpiration() {
            when(mockReferral.getTtl()).thenReturn(300);
            when(mockReferral.getRFlags()).thenReturn(0);

   * thisComparator))} instead.
   *
   * @return an immutable {@code RandomAccess} list of the {@code k} least elements in ascending
   *     order
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code k} is negative
   * @since 8.0
   */
  public <E extends T> List<E> leastOf(Iterable<E> iterable, int k) {
    if (iterable instanceof Collection) {
      Collection<E> collection = (Collection<E>) iterable;

            assertEquals(Integer.MAX_VALUE, response.getCount());
            assertEquals(Integer.MAX_VALUE, response.getRemaining());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle negative values as unsigned")
        void testNegativeValuesAsUnsigned() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            byte[] buffer = new byte[64];
            SMBUtil.writeInt2(17, buffer, 0); // Structure size

import junit.framework.Test;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Tests {@link MapTestSuiteBuilder} by using it against maps that have various negative behaviors.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // test-suite builders
public final class MapTestSuiteBuilderTests extends TestCase {
  private MapTestSuiteBuilderTests() {}