}

    /**
     * Adds {@code element} to the {@code ImmutableSortedSet}. If the {@code ImmutableSortedSet}
     * already contains {@code element}, then {@code add} has no effect. (only the previously added
     * element is retained).
     *
     * @param element the element to add
     * @return this {@code Builder} object
     * @throws NullPointerException if {@code element} is null

    thread.setPriority(Thread.MAX_PRIORITY);
    Thread.class.getMethod("resume").invoke(thread);
    thread.join();
    // It's possible to race and suspend the thread just before the park call actually takes effect,
    // causing the thread to be suspended for 3.5 seconds, and then park itself for 2 seconds after
    // being resumed. To avoid a flake in this scenario, calculate how long that thread actually

Au final, dans les deux situations, il est fort probable que **FastAPI** soit tout de même [plus rapide](index.md#performance){.internal-link target=_blank} que (ou au moins de vitesse égale à) votre framework précédent.

### Dépendances

			// TODO: if large prefixes of sep are matching
			// we should cutover at even larger average skips,
			// because Equal becomes that much more expensive.
			// This code does not take that effect into account.
			j := bytealg.IndexRabinKarp(s[i:], sep)
			if j < 0 {
				return -1
			}
			return i + j
		}
	}
	return -1
}

// Cut slices s around the first instance of sep,

 
## Changes by Kind

### Deprecation

- Controller-manager: the following flags have no effect and would be removed in v1.24:
  - `--port`
  - `--address`
  The insecure port flags `--port` may only be set to 0 now.
  
  In addtion, please be careful that:

	// Sample bucket policy.
	bucketPolicyBuf := `{"Version":"2012-10-17","Statement":[{"Action":["s3:GetBucketLocation","s3:ListBucket"],"Effect":"Allow","Principal":{"AWS":["*"]},"Resource":["arn:aws:s3:::%s"]},{"Action":["s3:GetObject"],"Effect":"Allow","Principal":{"AWS":["*"]},"Resource":["arn:aws:s3:::%s/this*"]}]}`

	// generate a random bucket Name.
	bucketName := getRandomBucketName()

**What is the impact?**

A user that is authorized to create pods can make use of any existing PodSecurityPolicy, even ones they are not authorized to use.

**How can I mitigate this prior to installing 1.5.5?**

1. Export existing PodSecurityPolicy objects:
  * `kubectl get podsecuritypolicies -o yaml > psp.yaml`

# (1)
FROM python:3.9 as requirements-stage

# (2)
WORKDIR /tmp

# (3)
RUN pip install poetry

# (4)
COPY ./pyproject.toml ./poetry.lock* /tmp/

# (5)
RUN poetry export -f requirements.txt --output requirements.txt --without-hashes

# (6)
FROM python:3.9

# (7)
WORKDIR /code

# (8)
COPY --from=requirements-stage /tmp/requirements.txt /code/requirements.txt

		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusNotFound,
	},
	ErrAdminPolicyChangeAlreadyApplied: {
		Code:           "XMinioAdminPolicyChangeAlreadyApplied",
		Description:    "The specified policy change is already in effect.",
		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
	},

	ErrAdminInvalidArgument: {
		Code:           "XMinioAdminInvalidArgument",
		Description:    "Invalid arguments specified.",

   * be thrown by calling {@code finishToFuture().get()} if this were the last step. Calling {@code
   * cancel()} on the returned future has no effect on the {@code ClosingFuture} pipeline.
   *
   * <p>{@code statusFuture} differs from most methods on {@code ClosingFuture}: You can make calls