*/

@NullUnmarked
public class AbstractFutureFallbackAtomicHelperTest extends TestCase {

  // stash these in static fields to avoid loading them over and over again (speeds up test
  // execution significantly)

  /**
   * This classloader disallows {@link java.lang.invoke.VarHandle}, which will prevent us from
   * selecting the {@code VarHandleAtomicHelper} strategy.
   */

        language: ['java']
        # Learn more...
        # https://docs.github.com/en/github/finding-security-vulnerabilities-and-errors-in-your-code/configuring-code-scanning#overriding-automatic-language-detection

    steps:
    - name: Checkout repository
      uses: actions/checkout@v2
      with:
        # We must fetch at least the immediate parents so that if this is
        # a pull request then we can checkout the head.

should be reported by email to ******@****.***. Your email will be acknowledged within 48 hours,
and you'll receive a more detailed response to your email within 72 hours indicating the next steps
in handling your report.

Please, provide a detailed explanation of the issue. In particular, outline the type of the security

          sb.append(DELIMITER_STRING);
        }
        sb.append(comp);
      }
      dummy ^= sb.toString().length();
    }
    return dummy;
  }

  /**
   * Similar to the above, but keeps a boolean flag rather than checking for the string accumulated
   * so far being empty. As a result, it does not have the above-mentioned bug.
   */
  @Benchmark
  int booleanIfFirst(int reps) {
    int dummy = 0;

   * created arrays to have a {@code @Nullable} element type even when they're created directly with
   * {@code new ImmutableMapEntry[...]}, so it seems silly to insist on that only here.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // Safe as long as the javadocs are followed
  static <K, V> ImmutableMapEntry<K, V>[] createEntryArray(int size) {

jobs:
  close-issues:
    # Don't do this in forks
    if: github.repository == 'tensorflow/tensorflow'
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      issues: write
      pull-requests: write
    steps:
      - name: Awaiting response issues
        uses: actions/stale@5bef64f19d7facfb25b37b414482c7164d639639 # v9.1.0
        with:

				logger.Info("Waiting for AuthN to be initialized.. (retrying in %s)", retryInterval)
			}
			if !authZInit {
				logger.Info("Waiting for AuthZ to be initialized.. (retrying in %s)", retryInterval)
			}
			time.Sleep(retryInterval)
			continue
		}

		break
	}

	// Initialize IAM store
	sys.Lock()

	sys.initStore(objAPI, etcdClient)

	// Initialize RoleARNs

   - Keep PRs focused—one feature or fix. Split large changes into multiple PRs.

3. **Testing**:
   - Include unit tests for new functionality or bug fixes.
   - Ensure existing tests pass (`make test`).
   - Document testing steps in the PR summary if manual testing was performed.

4. **Before Submitting**:
   - Run `make verify` to check formatting, linting, and tests.
   - Reference related issues (e.g., “Closes #1234”).

  considered to be in Apache Maven's scope.
+ Submit a ticket for your issue, assuming one does not already exist.
  + Clearly describe the issue, including steps to reproduce when it is a bug.
  + Make sure you fill in the earliest version that you know has the issue.
+ Fork the repository on GitHub.

Making and Submitting Changes
--------------

     * and applies it by sleeping the current thread.
     */
    public void delayByRules() {
        final long delay = getDelay();
        if (delay > 0) {
            ThreadUtil.sleep(delay);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Calculates the delay in milliseconds based on current time and configured rules.
     * The method checks each rule to see if it applies to the current time and day.
     *