return new CompositionPredicate<>(predicate, function);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a predicate that evaluates to {@code true} if the {@code CharSequence} being tested
   * contains any match for the given regular expression pattern. The test used is equivalent to
   * {@code Pattern.compile(pattern).matcher(arg).find()}
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the pattern is invalid
   * @since 3.0
   */

Let's put that data in the Pydantic `UserInDB` model first.

You should never save plaintext passwords, so, we'll use the (fake) password hashing system.

If the passwords don't match, we return the same error.

#### Password hashing { #password-hashing }

"Hashing" means: converting some content (a password in this case) into a sequence of bytes (just a string) that looks like gibberish.

  }

  /**
   * Earlier implementations of Android's hostname verifier required that wildcard names wouldn't
   * match "*.com" or similar. This was a nonstandard check that we've since dropped. It is the CA's
   * responsibility to not hand out certificates that match so broadly.
   */
  @Test fun wildcardsDoesNotNeedTwoDots() {
    // openssl req -x509 -nodes -days 36500 -subj '/CN=*.com' -newkey rsa:512 -out cert.pem

            saveInfo(messages -> messages.addSuccessCrudDeleteCrudTable(GLOBAL));
        });
        return redirect(getClass());
    }

    /**
     * Deletes all failure URL records that match the current search criteria.
     *
     * @return HTML response redirecting to the failure URL list page
     */
    @Execute
    @Secured({ ROLE })
    public HtmlResponse deleteall() {

      A finalAccum = scheme.result(collector, inputs);
      if (collector.characteristics().contains(Collector.Characteristics.IDENTITY_FINISH)) {
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // `R` and `A` match for an `IDENTITY_FINISH`
        R result = (R) finalAccum;
        assertEquivalent(expectedResult, result);
      }
      assertEquivalent(expectedResult, collector.finisher().apply(finalAccum));
    }
  }

    void testGetDefaultPort() {
        // Arrange
        Handler handler = newHandler();
        // Act & Assert
        assertEquals(SmbConstants.DEFAULT_PORT, handler.getDefaultPort(), "Default port should match SmbConstants");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("openConnection returns SmbFile using provided CIFSContext")
    void testOpenConnection_UsesProvidedContext() throws MalformedURLException, IOException {

// Returns the part file name which matches the partNumber and etag.
func getPartFile(entriesTrie *trie.Trie, partNumber int, etag string) (partFile string) {
	for _, match := range entriesTrie.PrefixMatch(fmt.Sprintf("%.5d.%s.", partNumber, etag)) {
		partFile = match
		break
	}
	return partFile
}

func partNumberToRangeSpec(oi ObjectInfo, partNumber int) *HTTPRangeSpec {
	if oi.Size == 0 || len(oi.Parts) == 0 {
		return nil

     * both say in their comments that they're not really sure what the right approach is. We go
     * with Chrome's behavior (which also experimentally seems to match what IE does), but if you
     * actually want to have a good chance of things working, please avoid double-quotes, newlines,
     * percent signs, and the like in your field names.
     */

> Notice the requirement of common SLA here original cluster had 1024 drives with 16 drives per erasure set with default parity of '4', second pool is expected to have a minimum of 8 drives per erasure set to match the original cluster SLA (parity count) of '4'. '12' drives stripe per erasure set in the second pool satisfies the original pool's parity count.

            "The remote system is not reachable by the transport.",
            "The layered file system driver for this I/O tag did not handle it when needed.",
            "No more files were found that match the file specification.", };